Jerome Kym vs Max Houkes — Tulln CH Round of 32

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI2
Jerome Kym
#196ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
clay
NED
Max Houkes
#239ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Kym J.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Houkes M.
Kym J.
4662
Houkes M.
6341

Jerome Kym defeated Max Houkes 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Tulln CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Houkes M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve advantage — Kym J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Houkes M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Houkes M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
23
Break points saved·Dominant
91
66
Break points won·Slight edge
21
29
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
34
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Houkes M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.0+85 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Clay Elo 1444
6.6Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Houkes M.
Freshness·Dominant
64
100

Kym J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Houkes M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.
Neumayer L.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Choinski J.
Nicod J.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Nicod J.
6-46-4
Neumayer L.
Molleker R.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Nicod J.
Gakhov I.
6-35-76-2
Choinski J.
Rehberg M.
6-16-1
Nicod J.
Gakhov I.
6-35-76-2
Molleker R.
Paulson A.
6-46-756-3
Neumayer L.
Kym J.[2]
7-56-736-4
R16
Nicod J.
Masur D.
7-686-0
Neumayer L.
Crawford O.[6]
6-46-0
Nicod J.
Masur D.
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Moeller M.
7-626-767-5
Rehberg M.
Mikrut L.
6-03-66-1
Gakhov I.
Topo M.
7-676-2
Paulson A.
Sachko V.
6-17-5
Molleker R.
Royer V.
7-56-4
Kym J.[2]
Krumich M.
6-44-66-1
R32
Nicod J.
Oberleitner N.
6-43-66-4
Royer V.
Rola B.
6-46-2
Nicod J.
Oberleitner N.
6-43-66-4
Choinski J.
Kopriva V.[1]
1-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Rehberg M.
Nesterov P.
6-34-66-3
Mikrut L.
Jianu F.[7]
4-66-46-3
Topo M.
Piros Z.[4]
6-47-65
Gakhov I.
Schwaerzler J.
6-726-46-3
Masur D.
Novak D.[8]
6-35-76-4
Sachko V.
Misolic F.[5]
6-36-1
Paulson A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-67-5
Molleker R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-67-646-1
Crawford O.[6]
Giustino L.
7-6102-66-3
Neumayer L.
Kopp S.
6-46-2
Krumich M.
Forejtek J.
7-646-2
Kym J.[2]
Houkes M.
4-66-36-4