Kris Van Wyk vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Shanghai CH Round of 16

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
RSA
Kris Van Wyk
#853ATP
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
ARG
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1403Hard ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
Van Wyk K.
6-4 6-4
Gomez F.
Van Wyk K.
662
Gomez F.
440

Kris Van Wyk defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 6-4 6-4 in the Shanghai CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Kris Van Wyk edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Wyk K.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van Wyk K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Wyk K.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.8
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.3
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Wyk K.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Wyk K.Gomez F.
Freshness·
—
59

Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Hsu Y.[9]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Hsu Y.[9]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Shimabukuro S.
Wong C.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Hsu Y.[9]
Van Wyk K.
7-642-66-2
Gombos N.
Kachmazov A.
6-727-636-4
Wong C.[4]
Zhukayev B.
7-666-3
Shimabukuro S.
Svrcina D.
6-47-5
R16
Hsu Y.[9]
Watanuki Y.
2-66-44-0
Van Wyk K.
Gomez F.
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Cressy M.[8]
4-67-636-3
Zhukayev B.
Barrios Vera T.[7]
7-646-727-5
Wong C.[4]
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Svrcina D.
Hong S.[5]
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[2]
6-46-3
R32
Van Wyk K.
Garin C.[1]
6-36-1
Hsu Y.[9]
Wu Y.
6-753-3
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Sun F.
6-47-5
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
7-56-3
Gomez F.
Noguchi R.
7-57-64
Zhukayev B.
Rai A.
2-66-37-63
Watanuki Y.
Te R.
6-47-5
Polmans M.
Yunchaokete B.[3]
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.
Jubb P.
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Fatic N.
6-37-67
Cressy M.[8]
Mott B.
6-16-1
Peniston R.
Zhou Y.
6-46-2
Wong C.[4]
Gerasimov E.
7-646-1
Hong S.[5]
Wu T.
6-726-46-4
Svrcina D.
Mejia N.
6-16-1
Atmane T.[2]
Lajal M.
7-641-66-1