Coleman Wong vs Egor Gerasimov — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
HKG4
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Wong C.
7-6 6-1
Gerasimov E.
Wong C.
7762
Gerasimov E.
6410

Coleman Wong defeated Egor Gerasimov 7-6 6-1 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Coleman Wong came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Gerasimov E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Gerasimov E.
37
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Gerasimov E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.4
7.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Gerasimov E.
Clutch Rating·Even
43
44
Break points saved·Even
91
88
Break points won·Even
5
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerasimov E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Gerasimov E.
Freshness·
89
—

Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Hsu Y.[9]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Hsu Y.[9]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Shimabukuro S.
Wong C.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Hsu Y.[9]
Van Wyk K.
7-642-66-2
Gombos N.
Kachmazov A.
6-727-636-4
Wong C.[4]
Zhukayev B.
7-666-3
Shimabukuro S.
Svrcina D.
6-47-5
R16
Hsu Y.[9]
Watanuki Y.
2-66-44-0
Van Wyk K.
Gomez F.
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Cressy M.[8]
4-67-636-3
Zhukayev B.
Barrios Vera T.[7]
7-646-727-5
Wong C.[4]
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Svrcina D.
Hong S.[5]
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[2]
6-46-3
R32
Van Wyk K.
Garin C.[1]
6-36-1
Hsu Y.[9]
Wu Y.
6-753-3
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Sun F.
6-47-5
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
7-56-3
Gomez F.
Noguchi R.
7-57-64
Zhukayev B.
Rai A.
2-66-37-63
Watanuki Y.
Te R.
6-47-5
Polmans M.
Yunchaokete B.[3]
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.
Jubb P.
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Fatic N.
6-37-67
Cressy M.[8]
Mott B.
6-16-1
Peniston R.
Zhou Y.
6-46-2
Wong C.[4]
Gerasimov E.
7-646-1
Hong S.[5]
Wu T.
6-726-46-4
Svrcina D.
Mejia N.
6-16-1
Atmane T.[2]
Lajal M.
7-641-66-1