Ivan Gakhov vs Marko Topo — Tulln CH Round of 16

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
clay
GER
Marko Topo
#374ATP
1463ELO
1399Clay ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLLL
Gakhov I.
7-6 6-2
Topo M.
Gakhov I.
7962
Topo M.
6720

Ivan Gakhov defeated Marko Topo 7-6 6-2 in the Tulln CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Topo M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Topo M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Topo M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
87
Break points won·Slight edge
9
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Topo M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.3Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
5.7+15 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1463
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Minutes 14d
9.0
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Topo M.
Freshness·
—
79

Topo M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.
Neumayer L.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Choinski J.
Nicod J.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Nicod J.
6-46-4
Neumayer L.
Molleker R.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Nicod J.
Gakhov I.
6-35-76-2
Choinski J.
Rehberg M.
6-16-1
Nicod J.
Gakhov I.
6-35-76-2
Molleker R.
Paulson A.
6-46-756-3
Neumayer L.
Kym J.[2]
7-56-736-4
R16
Nicod J.
Masur D.
7-686-0
Neumayer L.
Crawford O.[6]
6-46-0
Nicod J.
Masur D.
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Moeller M.
7-626-767-5
Rehberg M.
Mikrut L.
6-03-66-1
Gakhov I.
Topo M.
7-676-2
Paulson A.
Sachko V.
6-17-5
Molleker R.
Royer V.
7-56-4
Kym J.[2]
Krumich M.
6-44-66-1
R32
Nicod J.
Oberleitner N.
6-43-66-4
Royer V.
Rola B.
6-46-2
Nicod J.
Oberleitner N.
6-43-66-4
Choinski J.
Kopriva V.[1]
1-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Rehberg M.
Nesterov P.
6-34-66-3
Mikrut L.
Jianu F.[7]
4-66-46-3
Topo M.
Piros Z.[4]
6-47-65
Gakhov I.
Schwaerzler J.
6-726-46-3
Masur D.
Novak D.[8]
6-35-76-4
Sachko V.
Misolic F.[5]
6-36-1
Paulson A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-67-5
Molleker R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-67-646-1
Crawford O.[6]
Giustino L.
7-6102-66-3
Neumayer L.
Kopp S.
6-46-2
Krumich M.
Forejtek J.
7-646-2
Kym J.[2]
Houkes M.
4-66-36-4