Damir Dzumhur vs Jesper De Jong — Istanbul CH Semi-final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Damir Dzumhur
BIH1
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1596Hard ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
Jesper De Jong
NED3
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Dzumhur D.
2-6 7-5 7-6
De Jong J.
Dzumhur D.
27792
De Jong J.
65671

Damir Dzumhur defeated Jesper De Jong 2-6 7-5 7-6 in the Istanbul CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dzumhur D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Dzumhur D.De Jong J.
2
Serve
23
35
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Dzumhur D.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.0
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 157). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dzumhur D.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
57
Break points saved·Even
87
90
Break points won·Dominant
64
37
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
69
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dzumhur D.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
De Jong J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.4Hard Elo 1596
Surface ELO
4.6+11 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1638
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dzumhur D.De Jong J.
Freshness·Even
76
78

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d) · De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[1]
Medjedovic H.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
De Jong J.[3]
2-67-57-67
Medjedovic H.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-766-14-0
De Jong J.[3]
Simakin I.
6-737-56-3
Medjedovic H.[5]
Dodig M.
6-06-4
Landaluce M.
Moller E.
6-26-4
R16
Moller E.
Geerts M.
7-666-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Ymer E.
6-41-1
Dzumhur D.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-26-2
De Jong J.[3]
Agafonov E.
4-66-16-4
Dodig M.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-33-67-63
Landaluce M.
Purtseladze S.
6-46-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Lock B.
4-66-16-0
Simakin I.
Brouwer G.
6-04-66-3
R32
Simakin I.
Vesely J.
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[1]
Berankis R.
2-2
Brouwer G.
Yevseyev D.[8]
6-42-1
Pinnington Jones J.
Dougaz A.
4-66-36-0
Geerts M.
Kukushkin M.[2]
4-66-37-5
De Jong J.[3]
Boitan G.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Medjedovic H.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-4
Lock B.
Holmgren A.[6]
7-636-1
Purtseladze S.
Damm M.[7]
6-36-1
Agafonov E.
Erel Y.
3-66-37-64
Dodig M.
Duran T.
6-36-4
Landaluce M.
Zhukov M.
6-34-66-4
Moller E.
Kirci K.
6-26-1
Prizmic D.
Ilkel C.
6-726-36-2
Ymer E.
Cretu C.
7-656-4