Marin Cilic vs Kyle Edmund — Cassis CH Round of 16

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marin Cilic
CRO
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
GBR
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
Cilic M.
6-2 7-5
Edmund K.
Cilic M.
672
Edmund K.
250

Marin Cilic defeated Kyle Edmund 6-2 7-5 in the Cassis CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Marin Cilic extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marin Cilic closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-01-15Australian OpenSFhardMarin Cilic6-2 7-6(4) 6-2
2017-10-09Shanghai MastersR32hardMarin Cilic6-3 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Edmund K.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cilic M.Edmund K.
57
Serve
—
10
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Edmund K.
1st serve in·Even
57%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
78%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
68%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.8
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Edmund K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Clear edge
41
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Edmund K.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
4.5
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Edmund K.
Freshness·
98
—

Cilic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gasquet R.[3]
Rodionov J.
3-66-16-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Rocha H.[8]
6-33-66-2
Gasquet R.[3]
Soriano Barrera A.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Bertrand R.
6-36-4
Rocha H.[8]
Lokoli L.
6-26-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Droguet T.[5]
6-26-716-3
Soriano Barrera A.
Cilic M.
7-647-5
R16
Droguet T.[5]
Naw H.
6-26-4
Rodionov J.
Lestienne C.[1]
7-56-4
Bertrand R.
Faria J.[7]
3-66-36-2
Lokoli L.
Trungelliti M.[4]
4-66-36-3
Rocha H.[8]
Added D.
4-66-36-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-36-3
Cilic M.
Edmund K.
6-27-5
Soriano Barrera A.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-36-4
R32
Trungelliti M.[4]
Marie J.
7-657-62
Rocha H.[8]
Vallejo A.
7-56-3
Soriano Barrera A.
Poullain L.
6-26-3
Naw H.
Searle H.
7-626-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-636-3
Rodionov J.
Malige M.
6-46-4
Bertrand R.
Bourgue M.
6-26-1
Faria J.[7]
Broady L.
7-626-3
Lokoli L.
Guinard M.
7-636-3
Added D.
Salvestre D.
6-26-4
Droguet T.[5]
Gray A.
6-47-5
Cornut Chauvinc A.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Bellier A.
7-646-2
Cilic M.
Blanchet U.[6]
6-756-27-64
Edmund K.
Escoffier A.
6-46-1
Bonzi B.[2]
Broom C.
6-37-63