Carlos Taberner vs Dino Prizmic — Porto CH Quarter-final

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Carlos Taberner
ESP4
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1445Hard ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2024
hard
Dino Prizmic
CRO
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1733Hard ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
Taberner C.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Prizmic D.
Taberner C.
6162
Prizmic D.
3631

Carlos Taberner defeated Dino Prizmic 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the Porto CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84, but Carlos Taberner had arrived on a 8-match winning run.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Prizmic D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Taberner C.Prizmic D.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
20

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Prizmic D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Prizmic D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
92
Break points won·Slight edge
59
64
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Prizmic D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
1.5Hard Elo 1445
Surface ELO
8.5+288 Hard Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1841
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.7
10.08-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Taberner C.Prizmic D.
Freshness·
—
87

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Holmgren A.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-637-66
Andreev A.[6]
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Moro Canas A.[6]
Faria J.[5]
6-34-1
Holmgren A.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-767-57-65
Taberner C.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
5-76-06-0
Andreev A.[6]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.[3]
Martinez A.
6-46-1
Moro Canas A.[6]
Butvilas E.
4-67-686-4
Faria J.[5]
Ursu V.
6-766-37-5
Holmgren A.
Reymond A.
6-24-66-3
Taberner C.[4]
Prizmic D.
6-31-66-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Dalla Valle E.
7-57-5
Andreev A.[6]
Cukierman D.
7-676-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Masur D.
7-676-4
R16
Holmgren A.
Skatov T.[8]
7-667-65
Faria J.[5]
Domingues J.
0-66-36-4
Butvilas E.
Klein L.[1]
6-47-68
Moro Canas A.[6]
Blockx A.
7-606-4
Ursu V.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Martinez A.
Rocha H.[7]
6-26-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
De Loore J.
7-646-3
Reymond A.
Kachmazov A.
6-47-64
Prizmic D.
Mager G.[7]
2-0
Dalla Valle E.
Faria J.[2]
6-13-67-65
Masur D.
Rocha H.[3]
4-66-16-4
Taberner C.[4]
Echargui M.
6-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.[6]
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Cukierman D.
Forejtek J.
3-66-46-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Barton H.
6-36-4
R32
De Loore J.
Royer V.
7-656-737-65
Kachmazov A.
Sanchez Quilez A.
6-17-5
Skatov T.[8]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-3
Domingues J.
Marie J.
6-36-1
Butvilas E.
Bertrand R.
6-26-3
Martinez A.
Searle H.
7-6115-76-3
Klein L.[1]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-746-1
Blockx A.
Dougaz A.
6-46-2
Moro Canas A.[6]
Escoffier A.
4-67-56-1
Ursu V.
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Elias G.
Fanselow S.
6-37-61
Faria J.[5]
Piros Z.
6-16-2
Rocha H.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-26-4
Kukushkin M.[3]
Cui J.
3-66-26-1
Holmgren A.
Geerts M.
6-41-66-3
Reymond A.
Olivo R.
7-656-2
Cukierman D.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-647-65
Rocha H.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-16-2
Valkusz M.
Moeller M.
6-26-4
Andreev A.[6]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
Forejtek J.
Roca Batalla O.[1]
6-24-67-5
Faria J.[2]
Giustino L.
6-17-67
Taberner C.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-56-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Gadamauri B.
6-32-67-64
Mager G.[7]
Krutykh O.
6-47-64
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Kirkin E.[8]
6-36-0
Barton H.
Gakhov I.
6-26-2
Dalla Valle E.
Habib H.
7-656-3
Echargui M.
Campana Lee G.
6-746-46-3
Masur D.
Sakamoto P.
6-22-66-2
Neumayer L.
Fanselow S.
4-66-26-1
Prizmic D.
Elias G.
6-47-5