Hynek Barton vs Enzo Wallart — Porto CH Qualifying Round 2

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
CZE3
Hynek Barton
#256ATP
1570ELO
1509Hard ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2024
hard
FRA12
Enzo Wallart
#1060ATP
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLLL
Barton H.
6-3 6-2
Wallart E.
Barton H.
662
Wallart E.
320

Hynek Barton defeated Enzo Wallart 6-3 6-2 in the Porto CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barton H.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wallart E.

Wallart E.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Barton H.

Serve advantage — Barton H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barton H.Wallart E.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barton H.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Wallart E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Barton H.Wallart E.
Freshness·
93
—

Barton H.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Searle H.
Cui J.[3]
6-47-66
Olivo R.[1]
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-3
De Schepper K.
Ursu V.[2]
6-36-1
Reymond A.
Poullain L.[4]
6-16-4
Sanchez Quilez A.
Araujo P.
7-56-746-3
Butvilas E.[10]
Bax F.
6-36-2
Cukierman D.[9]
Krutykh O.[6]
6-46-3
Campana Lee G.[4]
Domingues J.[10]
4-66-36-4
Echargui M.[1]
Pereira T.[8]
6-36-4
Valkusz M.[2]
Araujo P.[7]
6-16-4
Barton H.[3]
Wallart E.[12]
6-36-2
Gadamauri B.[11]
Buldorini P.
6-26-4
Q1
Araujo P.
Glinka D.[8]
3-67-676-4
Ursu V.[2]
Pereira T.
6-36-1
Cui J.[3]
Silva T.
6-46-0
Soriano Barrera A.
Vale D.[12]
6-33-66-3
De Schepper K.
Merida Aguilar D.[9]
3-66-46-4
Searle H.
Gengel M.[11]
6-16-4
Poullain L.[4]
Marques D.
6-06-3
Reymond A.
Gautier A.[7]
6-16-4
Sanchez Quilez A.
Bobrov B.[5]
7-606-2
Bax F.
Karlovskiy E.[6]
6-36-4
Butvilas E.[10]
Graa J.
6-47-5
Domingues J.[10]
Banthia S.
6-36-4
Campana Lee G.[4]
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-16-2
Buldorini P.
Alcala Gurri M.[5]
6-42-66-4
Krutykh O.[6]
De Schepper K.
6-47-5
Araujo P.[7]
Valdoleiros G.
6-06-1
Pereira T.[8]
Portugal J.
6-26-0
Cukierman D.[9]
Rocha F.
6-26-2
Gadamauri B.[11]
Marques D.
6-26-3
Wallart E.[12]
Izquierdo Luque R.
4-67-52-0