Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Yafan Wang — Cleveland Round of 32

Cleveland · WTA · Round of 32
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESP
Sara Sorribes Tormo
#212WTA
1664ELO
1590Hard ELO
29 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2024
hard
CHN
Yafan Wang
#358WTA
1704ELO
1673Hard ELO
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-4 6-1
Wang Y.
Sorribes Tormo S.
662
Wang Y.
410

Sara Sorribes Tormo defeated Yafan Wang 6-4 6-1 in the Cleveland round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sara Sorribes Tormo came in ranked #212, defending the title. Sara Sorribes Tormo extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-06ShenzhenR32hardYafan Wang1-6 6-1 6-3
2017-10-09TianjinR16hardSara Sorribes Tormo6-4 2-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wang Y.

Wang Y.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sorribes Tormo S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sorribes Tormo S.Wang Y.
1st serve in·Clear edge
73%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
56%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
53%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
47%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sorribes Tormo S.Wang Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
51
Break points saved·Dominant
19
76
Break points won·Dominant
99
62
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
5
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sorribes Tormo S.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Wang Y.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1590
Surface ELO
6.1+83 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1664
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1704
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sorribes Tormo S.Wang Y.
Freshness·
97
—

Sorribes Tormo S.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kessler M.
Haddad Maia B.[1]
1-66-17-5
Semi-finals
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Siniakova K.[3]
6-32-66-2
Kessler M.
Potapova A.[5]
4-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Burel C.
6-26-2
Kessler M.
Rus A.
6-46-2
Potapova A.[5]
Bogdan A.
6-26-1
Siniakova K.[3]
Stearns P.[6]
1-66-36-4
R16
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-26-1
Bogdan A.
Minnen G.
7-636-3
Rus A.
Tomova V.[7]
6-36-3
Burel C.
Kenin S.[8]
6-46-3
Kessler M.
Wang X.[4]
3-66-46-2
Siniakova K.[3]
Bouzas Maneiro J.
2-66-47-62
Stearns P.[6]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[5]
Tauson C.
6-26-2
R32
Haddad Maia B.[1]
Golubic V.
6-37-5
Bucsa C.
Trevisan M.
6-26-4
Tauson C.
Schmiedlova A.
3-66-36-2
Bouzas Maneiro J.
Gracheva V.
4-66-36-2
Bogdan A.
Fernandez L.[2]
1-67-626-2
Kenin S.[8]
Volynets K.
6-22-67-5
Tomova V.[7]
Davis L.
6-16-4
Siniakova K.[3]
Ishii S.
6-756-37-65
Rus A.
Bronzetti L.
6-37-64
Wang X.[4]
Blinkova A.
6-16-1
Potapova A.[5]
Parry D.
6-36-2
Minnen G.
Cristian J.
6-37-65
Burel C.
Kalieva E.
6-36-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Wang Y.
6-46-1
Stearns P.[6]
Uchijima M.
6-01-66-1
Kessler M.
Scott K.
6-14-66-4