Woobin Shin vs Ryan Peniston — Jinan CH Round of 32

Jinan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR
Woobin Shin
#898ATP
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2024
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR3
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Shin W.
7-5 6-3
Peniston R.
Shin W.
762
Peniston R.
530

Woobin Shin defeated Ryan Peniston 7-5 6-3 in the Jinan CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Woobin Shin closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shin W.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Shin W.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shin W.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shin W.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 133 days (−1.5)
Peniston R.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.9
Surface form
2.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Noguchi R.[5]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Noguchi R.[5]
Shimizu Y.[1]
7-643-67-5
Wu Y.
Smith K.
3-66-06-2
Quarter-finals
Wu Y.
Sun F.
6-36-2
Shimizu Y.[1]
Henning P.
6-45-77-5
Noguchi R.[5]
Shin W.
6-36-2
Smith K.
Mo Y.
6-26-2
R16
Sun F.
Bradshaw J.
6-22-67-64
Shimizu Y.[1]
Zhou Y.
6-26-1
Henning P.
Sin S.
6-26-3
Shin W.
Rai A.
3-66-16-4
Noguchi R.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-36-3
Wu Y.
Wu T.[4]
7-57-5
Smith K.
Nam J.
7-667-5
Mo Y.
Bai Y.[2]
6-46-756-4
R32
Zhou Y.
Ayeni O.
7-646-2
Bai Y.[2]
Donskoy E.
6-27-66
Mo Y.
Ochi M.
6-26-3
Wu T.[4]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Shimizu Y.[1]
Jin Y.
6-46-2
Henning P.
Moriya H.
6-06-4
Sin S.
Cui J.[6]
6-06-2
Shin W.
Peniston R.[3]
7-56-3
Rai A.
Weber A.
6-41-66-3
Mchugh A.
Van Wyk K.
7-636-4
Noguchi R.[5]
Bobrov B.
7-56-4
Bradshaw J.
Uchida K.[8]
7-692-67-69
Sun F.
Karlovskiy E.
6-26-4
Wu Y.
Sakellaridis S.
4-66-16-4
Smith K.
Haliak M.[7]
6-46-1
Nam J.
Palan D.
6-36-756-3