Juncheng Shang vs Francisco Comesana — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2024
hard
Francisco Comesana
ARG
Francisco Comesana
#91ATP
1695ELO
1642Hard ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Shang J.
6-2 6-1
Comesana F.
Shang J.
662
Comesana F.
210

Juncheng Shang defeated Francisco Comesana 6-2 6-1 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Juncheng Shang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Juncheng Shang extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05Hong KongR32hardJuncheng Shang6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Comesana F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Comesana F.
34
Serve
18
18
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Comesana F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
6.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Comesana F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
90
Break points won·Slight edge
45
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Comesana F.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
6.0+57 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1642
6.3Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1695
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shang J.Comesana F.
Freshness·
—
87

Comesana F.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Sonego L.[10]
Michelsen A.[11]
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Sonego L.[10]
Goffin D.
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[11]
Carreno Busta P.
7-652-1
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.
Hijikata R.[16]
6-16-3
Sonego L.[10]
Kotov P.[15]
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.
Tien L.
6-46-2
Michelsen A.[11]
Eubanks C.
7-56-767-65
R16
Eubanks C.
Safiullin R.[17]
6-31-67-68
Carreno Busta P.
Vukic A.
6-34-66-3
Michelsen A.[11]
Bergs Z.
6-16-2
Hijikata R.[16]
Coric B.
3-66-37-5
Sonego L.[10]
Shang J.
W/O
Tien L.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-3
Goffin D.
Rinderknech A.[12]
6-36-3
Kotov P.[15]
Svajda Z.
3-66-36-4
R32
Rinderknech A.[12]
Oconnell C.
6-36-4
Goffin D.
Darderi L.[5]
6-26-4
Svajda Z.
Cerundolo F.[3]
6-46-4
Tien L.
Marozsan F.[9]
6-26-717-62
Eubanks C.
Gaston H.[14]
6-16-4
Safiullin R.[17]
Moutet C.
6-17-5
Michelsen A.[11]
Fucsovics M.
7-636-4
Vukic A.
Mannarino A.[4]
7-652-66-1
Kotov P.[15]
Muller A.
6-45-76-2
Sonego L.[10]
Stricker D.
6-46-1
Shang J.
Navone M.[7]
7-56-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Borges N.[8]
7-626-2
Coric B.
Baez S.[1]
6-36-4
Bergs Z.
Etcheverry T.[6]
4-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Shevchenko A.[13]
6-26-2
Hijikata R.[16]
Cazaux A.
4-66-37-64
R64
Cazaux A.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-17-63
Svajda Z.
Djere L.
6-46-1
Muller A.
Lestienne C.
6-36-2
Shang J.
Comesana F.
6-26-1
Tien L.
Schoolkate T.
3-66-26-3
Coric B.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Stricker D.
Coria F.
7-56-2
Carreno Busta P.
Kumar O.
6-26-0
Vukic A.
Evans D.
2-66-46-1
Bergs Z.
Opelka R.
6-43-67-61
Fucsovics M.
Daniel T.
4-66-16-2
Moutet C.
Mejia N.
7-656-1
Oconnell C.
Kirchheimer S.
7-56-4
Eubanks C.
Walton A.
2-67-56-4
Goffin D.
Munar J.
7-54-66-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Duckworth J.
3-66-36-4