Arthur Cazaux vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2024
hard
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Cazaux A.
6-1 7-6
Van De Zandschulp B.
Cazaux A.
6772
Van De Zandschulp B.
1630

Arthur Cazaux defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-1 7-6 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Van De Zandschulp B.
40
Serve
41
19
Return
43

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (115 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
77
Break points saved·Even
97
98
Break points won·Dominant
27
68
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+27 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 1711
5.3Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1743
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cazaux A.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·
—
95

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Sonego L.[10]
Michelsen A.[11]
6-06-3
Semi-finals
Sonego L.[10]
Goffin D.
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[11]
Carreno Busta P.
7-652-1
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.
Hijikata R.[16]
6-16-3
Sonego L.[10]
Kotov P.[15]
6-37-5
Carreno Busta P.
Tien L.
6-46-2
Michelsen A.[11]
Eubanks C.
7-56-767-65
R16
Eubanks C.
Safiullin R.[17]
6-31-67-68
Carreno Busta P.
Vukic A.
6-34-66-3
Michelsen A.[11]
Bergs Z.
6-16-2
Hijikata R.[16]
Coric B.
3-66-37-5
Sonego L.[10]
Shang J.
W/O
Tien L.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-3
Goffin D.
Rinderknech A.[12]
6-36-3
Kotov P.[15]
Svajda Z.
3-66-36-4
R32
Rinderknech A.[12]
Oconnell C.
6-36-4
Goffin D.
Darderi L.[5]
6-26-4
Svajda Z.
Cerundolo F.[3]
6-46-4
Tien L.
Marozsan F.[9]
6-26-717-62
Eubanks C.
Gaston H.[14]
6-16-4
Safiullin R.[17]
Moutet C.
6-17-5
Michelsen A.[11]
Fucsovics M.
7-636-4
Vukic A.
Mannarino A.[4]
7-652-66-1
Kotov P.[15]
Muller A.
6-45-76-2
Sonego L.[10]
Stricker D.
6-46-1
Shang J.
Navone M.[7]
7-56-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Borges N.[8]
7-626-2
Coric B.
Baez S.[1]
6-36-4
Bergs Z.
Etcheverry T.[6]
4-67-56-3
Carreno Busta P.
Shevchenko A.[13]
6-26-2
Hijikata R.[16]
Cazaux A.
4-66-37-64
R64
Cazaux A.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-17-63
Svajda Z.
Djere L.
6-46-1
Muller A.
Lestienne C.
6-36-2
Shang J.
Comesana F.
6-26-1
Tien L.
Schoolkate T.
3-66-26-3
Coric B.
Nagal S.
6-46-2
Stricker D.
Coria F.
7-56-2
Carreno Busta P.
Kumar O.
6-26-0
Vukic A.
Evans D.
2-66-46-1
Bergs Z.
Opelka R.
6-43-67-61
Fucsovics M.
Daniel T.
4-66-16-2
Moutet C.
Mejia N.
7-656-1
Oconnell C.
Kirchheimer S.
7-56-4
Eubanks C.
Walton A.
2-67-56-4
Goffin D.
Munar J.
7-54-66-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Duckworth J.
3-66-36-4