Bernard Tomic vs Nick Hardt — Santo Domingo CH Round of 32

Santo Domingo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
clay
Nick Hardt
DOM8
Nick Hardt
#275ATP
1473ELO
1460Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
Tomic B.
2-6 6-4 6-3
Hardt N.
Tomic B.
2662
Hardt N.
6431

Bernard Tomic defeated Nick Hardt 2-6 6-4 6-3 in the Santo Domingo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #206, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Hardt N.

Hardt N.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Hardt N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Hardt N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
26
Break points saved·Dominant
92
33
Break points won·Dominant
4
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Hardt N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
7.7
0.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Hardt N.
Freshness·Even
84
83

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Hardt N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Andrade A.
Djere L.[4]
2-67-657-65
Dzumhur D.[3]
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Andrade A.
Tomic B.
6-26-2
Djere L.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-26-1
Dzumhur D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
6-47-64
Olivo R.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-16-3
R16
Olivo R.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
W/O
Tomic B.
Clarke J.
7-656-3
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Popko D.
1-66-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Ficovich J.
6-16-2
Andrade A.
Prado Angelo J.
6-46-4
Djere L.[4]
Buse I.
4-66-36-2
Seggerman R.
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
4-67-627-66
R32
Djere L.[4]
Janvier M.
7-637-65
Tseng C.[5]
Alves M.
6-10-0
Dzumhur D.[3]
Kingsley C.
7-57-5
Popko D.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.
Bertran P.
6-36-2
Clarke J.
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Olivo R.
Draxl L.
7-56-3
Andrade A.
Coria F.[1]
6-46-1
Prado Angelo J.
Sakamoto P.
6-34-66-2
Tomic B.
Hardt N.[8]
2-66-46-3
Buse I.
Langmo C.
6-46-0
Seggerman R.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-653-66-1
Kestelboim M.
Cachin P.
6-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
Cid R.
7-627-5