Gabriel Diallo vs Coleman Wong — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gabriel Diallo
CAN
Gabriel Diallo
#93ATP
1716ELO
1678Hard ELO
$480kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
hard
HKG
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
Diallo G.
6-2 1-6 6-2
Wong C.
Diallo G.
6162
Wong C.
2621

Gabriel Diallo defeated Coleman Wong 6-2 1-6 6-2 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Gabriel Diallo came in ranked #93. Gabriel Diallo claimed a first win over Coleman Wong in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Gabriel Diallo closed it out in three sets, 6–2 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05Hong KongR16hardColeman Wong1-6 7-5 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Diallo G.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Diallo G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Diallo G.Wong C.
38
Serve
37
14
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Diallo G.Wong C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Even
8.6
8.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diallo G.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
64
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Clear edge
24
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diallo G.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Wong C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+85 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1593
5.5Overall Elo 1716
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1602
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
0.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diallo G.Wong C.
Freshness·Even
89
89

Diallo G.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Safiullin R.[1]
Bellucci M.
1-67-57-5
Semi-finals
Safiullin R.[1]
Goffin D.[4]
7-657-62
Bellucci M.
Diallo G.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.[4]
Virtanen O.
6-47-61
Safiullin R.[1]
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Bellucci M.
Kukushkin M.
6-16-3
Diallo G.
Boyer T.
7-666-716-4
R16
Eubanks C.
Harris B.[6]
7-656-766-2
Safiullin R.[1]
Atmane T.
6-43-66-4
Goffin D.[4]
Quinn E.
6-46-1
Virtanen O.
Jacquet K.
3-66-36-2
Kukushkin M.
Karatsev A.[5]
7-623-66-1
Bellucci M.
Basavareddy N.
6-26-2
Diallo G.
Van Assche L.[7]
6-46-3
Boyer T.
Medjedovic H.
6-26-1
R32
Atmane T.
Ajdukovic D.
6-44-66-4
Medjedovic H.
Riedi L.
7-650-0
Safiullin R.[1]
Gigante M.
7-52-66-4
Goffin D.[4]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-44-66-2
Eubanks C.
Shick B.
6-36-4
Harris B.[6]
Fonseca J.
6-21-66-3
Quinn E.
Ritschard A.
6-36-727-5
Jacquet K.
Nava E.
4-66-36-2
Virtanen O.
Mayot H.[8]
6-36-2
Karatsev A.[5]
Passaro F.
6-23-66-2
Kukushkin M.
Williams C.
5-76-46-4
Bellucci M.
Hong S.
6-46-2
Basavareddy N.
Walton A.[3]
6-46-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Bonzi B.
0-67-56-4
Diallo G.
Wong C.
6-21-66-2
Boyer T.
Muller A.[2]
7-656-4