Bernard Tomic vs Jay Clarke — Santo Domingo CH Round of 16

Santo Domingo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
clay
GBR
Jay Clarke
#246ATP
1458ELO
1414Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
Tomic B.
7-6 6-3
Clarke J.
Tomic B.
7762
Clarke J.
6530

Bernard Tomic defeated Jay Clarke 7-6 6-3 in the Santo Domingo CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #204, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Bernard Tomic extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-05-28Roland GarrosQ2clayBernard Tomic6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Clarke J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
8
Break points saved·Dominant
92
63
Break points won·Clear edge
4
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Clarke J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+6 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1414
6.0Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1458
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.3
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
8.3
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Clarke J.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
100

Tomic B.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Clarke J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Andrade A.
Djere L.[4]
2-67-657-65
Dzumhur D.[3]
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Andrade A.
Tomic B.
6-26-2
Djere L.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-26-1
Dzumhur D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
6-47-64
Olivo R.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-16-3
R16
Olivo R.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
W/O
Tomic B.
Clarke J.
7-656-3
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Popko D.
1-66-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Ficovich J.
6-16-2
Andrade A.
Prado Angelo J.
6-46-4
Djere L.[4]
Buse I.
4-66-36-2
Seggerman R.
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
4-67-627-66
R32
Djere L.[4]
Janvier M.
7-637-65
Tseng C.[5]
Alves M.
6-10-0
Dzumhur D.[3]
Kingsley C.
7-57-5
Popko D.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.
Bertran P.
6-36-2
Clarke J.
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Olivo R.
Draxl L.
7-56-3
Andrade A.
Coria F.[1]
6-46-1
Prado Angelo J.
Sakamoto P.
6-34-66-2
Tomic B.
Hardt N.[8]
2-66-46-3
Buse I.
Langmo C.
6-46-0
Seggerman R.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-653-66-1
Kestelboim M.
Cachin P.
6-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
Cid R.
7-627-5