Ignacio Buse vs Christian Langmo — Santo Domingo CH Round of 32

Santo Domingo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
clay
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1141Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Buse I.
6-4 6-0
Langmo C.
Buse I.
662
Langmo C.
400

Ignacio Buse defeated Christian Langmo 6-4 6-0 in the Santo Domingo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Buse I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Serve advantage — Buse I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Buse I.Langmo C.
41
Serve
—
14
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Buse I.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
7.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Buse I.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
23
Break points saved·Even
87
88
Break points won·Dominant
28
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Buse I.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+645 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1141
10.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
6.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Buse I.Langmo C.
Freshness·Dominant
98
65

Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Andrade A.
Djere L.[4]
2-67-657-65
Dzumhur D.[3]
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Andrade A.
Tomic B.
6-26-2
Djere L.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-26-1
Dzumhur D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
6-47-64
Olivo R.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-16-3
R16
Olivo R.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
W/O
Tomic B.
Clarke J.
7-656-3
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Kestelboim M.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Popko D.
1-66-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Ficovich J.
6-16-2
Andrade A.
Prado Angelo J.
6-46-4
Djere L.[4]
Buse I.
4-66-36-2
Seggerman R.
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
4-67-627-66
R32
Djere L.[4]
Janvier M.
7-637-65
Tseng C.[5]
Alves M.
6-10-0
Dzumhur D.[3]
Kingsley C.
7-57-5
Popko D.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Mejia N.
6-46-3
Ficovich J.
Bertran P.
6-36-2
Clarke J.
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Olivo R.
Draxl L.
7-56-3
Andrade A.
Coria F.[1]
6-46-1
Prado Angelo J.
Sakamoto P.
6-34-66-2
Tomic B.
Hardt N.[8]
2-66-46-3
Buse I.
Langmo C.
6-46-0
Seggerman R.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-36-4
Dellien Velasco M.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-653-66-1
Kestelboim M.
Cachin P.
6-36-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
Cid R.
7-627-5