Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Matteo Arnaldi — Cincinnati Masters Round of 64

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
ARG
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
#32ATP
1812ELO
1766Hard ELO
$1.4MYTD
$6.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
hard
Matteo Arnaldi
ITA
Matteo Arnaldi
#35ATP
1830ELO
1732Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWL
Etcheverry T.
6-3 6-7 6-2
Arnaldi M.
Etcheverry T.
66362
Arnaldi M.
37721

Tomas Martin Etcheverry defeated Matteo Arnaldi 6-3 6-7 6-2 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Martin Etcheverry came in ranked #32, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Etcheverry T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Arnaldi M.

Arnaldi M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Etcheverry T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Etcheverry T.Arnaldi M.
51
Serve
23
35
Return
22

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Etcheverry T.Arnaldi M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (149 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Etcheverry T.Arnaldi M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
70
78
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Clear edge
36
51
Deciding sets·Even
84
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
87
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Etcheverry T.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Arnaldi M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.4+34 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1732
6.7Overall Elo 1812
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1830
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
7.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
4.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Etcheverry T.Arnaldi M.
Freshness·Even
93
94

Etcheverry T.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Arnaldi M.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 47%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Tiafoe F.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[1]
Zverev A.[3]
7-695-77-64
Tiafoe F.
Rune H.[15]
4-66-17-64
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.
Hurkacz H.[5]
6-30-0
Sinner J.[1]
Rublev A.[6]
4-67-56-4
Zverev A.[3]
Shelton B.[12]
3-67-637-5
Rune H.[15]
Draper J.
6-46-2
R16
Sinner J.[1]
Thompson J.
W/O
Hurkacz H.[5]
Cobolli F.
6-33-66-1
Tiafoe F.
Lehecka J.
6-46-7107-65
Rublev A.[6]
Nakashima B.
7-656-1
Zverev A.[3]
Carreno Busta P.
7-57-66
Shelton B.[12]
Marozsan F.
6-46-3
Draper J.
Auger Aliassime F.
5-76-46-4
Rune H.[15]
Monfils G.
3-66-36-4
R32
Nakashima B.
Fils A.
7-57-63
Cobolli F.
Darderi L.
7-643-1
Marozsan F.
Dimitrov G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Hurkacz H.[5]
Nishioka Y.
3-67-646-1
Rublev A.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-46-3
Zverev A.[3]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
Carreno Busta P.
Purcell M.
6-36-3
Shelton B.[12]
Etcheverry T.
6-767-676-3
Lehecka J.
Medvedev D.[4]
7-626-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Ruud C.[7]
6-36-1
Draper J.
Tsitsipas S.[9]
3-66-47-5
Rune H.[15]
Borges N.
6-37-68
Monfils G.
Alcaraz C.[2]
4-67-656-4
Tiafoe F.
Musetti L.[14]
6-36-2
Sinner J.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
Baez S.
6-26-4
R64
Baez S.
Giron M.
6-45-77-66
Thompson J.
Humbert U.[13]
3-66-37-64
Shelton B.[12]
Opelka R.
7-637-63
Purcell M.
Machac T.
6-47-61
Cobolli F.
Paul T.[10]
6-24-67-5
Lehecka J.
Navone M.
7-636-3
Nakashima B.
Fritz T.[11]
6-44-67-64
Draper J.
Munar J.
7-53-67-65
Fils A.
Holt B.
6-46-1
Zhang Z.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-64
Khachanov K.
Cerundolo F.
6-06-3
Carreno Busta P.
Korda S.[16]
7-56-1
Marozsan F.
Moutet C.
6-47-62
Nishioka Y.
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
6-37-65
Musetti L.[14]
Jarry N.
4-67-657-64
Tiafoe F.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-37-66
Auger Aliassime F.
Kovacevic A.
6-36-1
Tsitsipas S.[9]
Struff J.
4-66-46-3
Rune H.[15]
Berrettini M.
2-66-16-4
Borges N.
Mannarino A.
6-43-66-1
Monfils G.
Popyrin A.
7-56-3
Etcheverry T.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-736-2
Michelsen A.
Griekspoor T.
6-15-76-2