Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi vs Clement Tabur — Todi CH Round of 32

Todi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
#320ATP
1392ELO
1382Clay ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA3
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWL
Ambrogi L.
7-5 7-6
Tabur C.
Ambrogi L.
7772
Tabur C.
5650

Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi defeated Clement Tabur 7-5 7-6 in the Todi CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Clement Tabur came in ranked #189, defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ambrogi L.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ambrogi L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ambrogi L.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ambrogi L.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
2
29
Break points saved·Dominant
27
74
Break points won·Clear edge
45
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
10
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ambrogi L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Tabur C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.8Clay Elo 1382
Surface ELO
8.2+172 Clay Elo edge
1.1Overall Elo 1392
ELO gap
8.9Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.6
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
3.5
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ambrogi L.Tabur C.
Freshness·Slight edge
77
85

Ambrogi L.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d) · Tabur C.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Taberner C.
Travaglia S.[1]
4-66-46-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Cretu C.
3-67-656-4
Quarter-finals
Cretu C.
Juarez F.
5-77-50-0
Travaglia S.[1]
Elias G.
7-616-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Giustino L.
2-66-26-4
Taberner C.
Pavlovic L.
6-46-767-65
R16
Cretu C.
Gill F.
2-67-656-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Lopez Montagud C.
6-46-4
Pavlovic L.
Maestrelli F.[4]
2-66-26-3
Elias G.
Agamenone F.
6-46-3
Giustino L.
Dodig M.
4-67-646-1
Juarez F.
Ambrogi L.
6-36-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Castagnola L.
7-676-3
Taberner C.
Basile P.
6-36-3
R32
Maestrelli F.[4]
Picchione A.
7-643-2
Travaglia S.[1]
Torres J.
5-76-36-4
Pavlovic L.
Neumayer L.
6-746-36-0
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Jianu F.[2]
6-40-66-3
Gill F.
Mager G.[9]
6-36-3
Ambrogi L.
Tabur C.[3]
7-57-65
Agamenone F.
Olivieri G.[5]
6-37-5
Dodig M.
Collarini A.[6]
6-37-5
Taberner C.
Blancaneaux G.[7]
6-36-1
Basile P.
Pennaforti G.
6-716-46-3
Castagnola L.
Ferrari G.
6-46-0
Cretu C.
Fonio G.
6-26-1
Elias G.
Dellavedova M.
6-16-1
Giustino L.
Cadenasso G.
6-36-3
Juarez F.
Klizan M.
6-46-3
Lopez Montagud C.
Piraino G.
6-16-2