Jack Draper vs Felix Auger Aliassime — Cincinnati Masters Round of 16

Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 16
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#131ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2024
hard
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Draper J.
5-7 6-4 6-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Draper J.
5662
Auger Aliassime F.
7441

Jack Draper defeated Felix Auger Aliassime 5-7 6-4 6-4 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, defending last year's round of 32. Jack Draper extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-09-15Davis Cup Finals RR: CAN vs GBRRRhardFelix Auger Aliassime7-6(8) 7-5
2022-08-29US OpenR64hardJack Draper6-4 6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Auger Aliassime F.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draper J.Auger Aliassime F.
—
Serve
74
—
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Auger Aliassime F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
68%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.3
9.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Auger Aliassime F.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
84
Break points saved·Even
99
100
Break points won·Dominant
83
50
Deciding sets·Even
96
99
Tiebreaks·Even
95
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Auger Aliassime F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1783
Surface ELO
5.9+150 Hard Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1958
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
5.5
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Auger Aliassime F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
59

Draper J.: 16 days rest · Auger Aliassime F.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 112 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 47%
Final
Sinner J.[1]
Tiafoe F.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[1]
Zverev A.[3]
7-695-77-64
Tiafoe F.
Rune H.[15]
4-66-17-64
Quarter-finals
Tiafoe F.
Hurkacz H.[5]
6-30-0
Sinner J.[1]
Rublev A.[6]
4-67-56-4
Zverev A.[3]
Shelton B.[12]
3-67-637-5
Rune H.[15]
Draper J.
6-46-2
R16
Sinner J.[1]
Thompson J.
W/O
Hurkacz H.[5]
Cobolli F.
6-33-66-1
Tiafoe F.
Lehecka J.
6-46-7107-65
Rublev A.[6]
Nakashima B.
7-656-1
Zverev A.[3]
Carreno Busta P.
7-57-66
Shelton B.[12]
Marozsan F.
6-46-3
Draper J.
Auger Aliassime F.
5-76-46-4
Rune H.[15]
Monfils G.
3-66-36-4
R32
Nakashima B.
Fils A.
7-57-63
Cobolli F.
Darderi L.
7-643-1
Marozsan F.
Dimitrov G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Hurkacz H.[5]
Nishioka Y.
3-67-646-1
Rublev A.[6]
Zhang Z.
6-46-3
Zverev A.[3]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
Carreno Busta P.
Purcell M.
6-36-3
Shelton B.[12]
Etcheverry T.
6-767-676-3
Lehecka J.
Medvedev D.[4]
7-626-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Ruud C.[7]
6-36-1
Draper J.
Tsitsipas S.[9]
3-66-47-5
Rune H.[15]
Borges N.
6-37-68
Monfils G.
Alcaraz C.[2]
4-67-656-4
Tiafoe F.
Musetti L.[14]
6-36-2
Sinner J.[1]
Michelsen A.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
Baez S.
6-26-4
R64
Baez S.
Giron M.
6-45-77-66
Thompson J.
Humbert U.[13]
3-66-37-64
Shelton B.[12]
Opelka R.
7-637-63
Purcell M.
Machac T.
6-47-61
Cobolli F.
Paul T.[10]
6-24-67-5
Lehecka J.
Navone M.
7-636-3
Nakashima B.
Fritz T.[11]
6-44-67-64
Draper J.
Munar J.
7-53-67-65
Fils A.
Holt B.
6-46-1
Zhang Z.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-37-64
Khachanov K.
Cerundolo F.
6-06-3
Carreno Busta P.
Korda S.[16]
7-56-1
Marozsan F.
Moutet C.
6-47-62
Nishioka Y.
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
6-37-65
Musetti L.[14]
Jarry N.
4-67-657-64
Tiafoe F.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-37-66
Auger Aliassime F.
Kovacevic A.
6-36-1
Tsitsipas S.[9]
Struff J.
4-66-46-3
Rune H.[15]
Berrettini M.
2-66-16-4
Borges N.
Mannarino A.
6-43-66-1
Monfils G.
Popyrin A.
7-56-3
Etcheverry T.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-736-2
Michelsen A.
Griekspoor T.
6-15-76-2