Clement Tabur vs Jakub Nicod — Bonn CH Round of 32

Bonn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2024
clay
CZE
Jakub Nicod
#731ATP
21 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
Tabur C.
7-6 6-3
Nicod J.
Tabur C.
71162
Nicod J.
6930

Clement Tabur defeated Jakub Nicod 7-6 6-3 in the Bonn CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Clement Tabur closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nicod J.

Nicod J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Nicod J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nicod J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Nicod J.
Freshness·
55
—

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[3]
Marterer M.[2]
7-626-0
Semi-finals
Dellien H.[3]
Landaluce M.
7-56-3
Marterer M.[2]
Hassan B.[5]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[2]
Squire H.[6]
6-46-3
Landaluce M.
Choinski J.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[3]
Hemery C.[7]
6-06-1
Hassan B.[5]
Svrcina D.
6-06-4
R16
Dellien H.[3]
Tabur C.
6-16-3
Hassan B.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-36-3
Choinski J.
Blancaneaux G.
7-653-66-3
Landaluce M.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-1
Hemery C.[7]
Jianu F.
6-46-746-3
Svrcina D.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
3-66-16-4
Squire H.[6]
Klizan M.
6-47-69
Marterer M.[2]
Habib H.
4-67-636-4
R32
Tabur C.
Nicod J.
7-696-3
Dellien H.[3]
Rehberg M.
6-36-1
Jianu F.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Hemery C.[7]
Masur D.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Vrbensky M.
6-16-756-2
Marterer M.[2]
Topo M.
6-27-5
Roca Batalla O.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-06-1
Tabur C.
Nicod J.
7-696-3
Blancaneaux G.
Dzumhur D.[1]
7-56-3
Choinski J.
Torres J.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.
Olivieri G.
6-16-4
Landaluce M.
Molleker R.[8]
2-67-626-1
Hassan B.[5]
Rodesch C.
6-27-69
Svrcina D.
Lamasine T.
6-36-3
Squire H.[6]
Milev Y.
6-36-4
Klizan M.
Engel J.
7-646-3
Habib H.
Collignon R.
7-636-2