Aidan Mayo vs Borna Gojo — Lincoln CH Round of 32

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Aidan Mayo
#674ATP
1380ELO
1359Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2024
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO8
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Mayo A.
7-6 6-1
Gojo B.
Mayo A.
7762
Gojo B.
6510

Aidan Mayo defeated Borna Gojo 7-6 6-1 in the Lincoln CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Aidan Mayo came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayo A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mayo A.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayo A.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
10.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayo A.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
53
Break points saved·Dominant
68
95
Break points won·Slight edge
1
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
52
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayo A.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gojo B.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 210 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
1.0Hard Elo 1359
Surface ELO
9.0+303 Hard Elo edge
1.0Overall Elo 1380
ELO gap
9.0Overall Elo 1683
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayo A.Gojo B.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
100

Mayo A.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Gojo B.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.
Wong C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Fearnley J.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
0-66-07-63
Wong C.
Basavareddy N.
6-757-636-0
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Mayo A.
5-76-46-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Schoolkate T.
7-636-2
Basavareddy N.
Jubb P.
7-56-3
Wong C.
Tu L.
7-56-1
R16
Mayo A.
Smith C.
6-37-63
Tu L.
Baris O.
6-35-76-3
Fearnley J.
Eubanks C.[1]
7-54-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Mayot H.[3]
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Williams C.
6-36-0
Jubb P.
Van Assche L.[4]
6-36-1
Wong C.
Pinnington Jones J.
1-66-26-4
R32
Baris O.
Takahashi Y.
1-0
Fearnley J.
Brouwer G.
6-16-1
Smith C.
Lapadat J.
6-06-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Nava E.[6]
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[1]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-4
Mayo A.
Gojo B.[8]
7-656-1
Mayot H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Boyer T.
7-57-60
Zhukayev B.
Shepp A.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Williams C.
Yevseyev D.[7]
7-637-5
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
2-66-46-2
Jubb P.
Torres Espinosa J.
6-16-4
Van Assche L.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-3
Wong C.
Quinn E.
6-16-3
Tu L.
Matsuda R.
6-26-4