Li Tu vs Ozan Baris — Lincoln CH Round of 16

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2024
hard
USA
Ozan Baris
#578ATP
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLLL
Tu L.
6-3 5-7 6-3
Baris O.
Tu L.
6562
Baris O.
3731

Li Tu defeated Ozan Baris 6-3 5-7 6-3 in the Lincoln CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Baris O.

Baris O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Baris O.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Baris O.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
2.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Baris O.
Freshness·
—
81

Baris O.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.
Wong C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Fearnley J.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
0-66-07-63
Wong C.
Basavareddy N.
6-757-636-0
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Mayo A.
5-76-46-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Schoolkate T.
7-636-2
Basavareddy N.
Jubb P.
7-56-3
Wong C.
Tu L.
7-56-1
R16
Mayo A.
Smith C.
6-37-63
Tu L.
Baris O.
6-35-76-3
Fearnley J.
Eubanks C.[1]
7-54-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Mayot H.[3]
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Williams C.
6-36-0
Jubb P.
Van Assche L.[4]
6-36-1
Wong C.
Pinnington Jones J.
1-66-26-4
R32
Baris O.
Takahashi Y.
1-0
Fearnley J.
Brouwer G.
6-16-1
Smith C.
Lapadat J.
6-06-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Nava E.[6]
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[1]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-4
Mayo A.
Gojo B.[8]
7-656-1
Mayot H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Boyer T.
7-57-60
Zhukayev B.
Shepp A.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Williams C.
Yevseyev D.[7]
7-637-5
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
2-66-46-2
Jubb P.
Torres Espinosa J.
6-16-4
Van Assche L.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-3
Wong C.
Quinn E.
6-16-3
Tu L.
Matsuda R.
6-26-4