Luca Van Assche vs Christian Langmo — Lincoln CH Round of 32

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luca Van Assche
FRA4
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1681Hard ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2024
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWWLLW
Van Assche L.
6-1 6-3
Langmo C.
Van Assche L.
662
Langmo C.
130

Luca Van Assche defeated Christian Langmo 6-1 6-3 in the Lincoln CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
23
Break points saved·Even
91
88
Break points won·Dominant
61
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
51
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+427 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1254
10.0Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Langmo C.
Freshness·Clear edge
99
86

Van Assche L.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.
Wong C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Fearnley J.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
0-66-07-63
Wong C.
Basavareddy N.
6-757-636-0
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Mayo A.
5-76-46-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Schoolkate T.
7-636-2
Basavareddy N.
Jubb P.
7-56-3
Wong C.
Tu L.
7-56-1
R16
Mayo A.
Smith C.
6-37-63
Tu L.
Baris O.
6-35-76-3
Fearnley J.
Eubanks C.[1]
7-54-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Mayot H.[3]
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Williams C.
6-36-0
Jubb P.
Van Assche L.[4]
6-36-1
Wong C.
Pinnington Jones J.
1-66-26-4
R32
Baris O.
Takahashi Y.
1-0
Fearnley J.
Brouwer G.
6-16-1
Smith C.
Lapadat J.
6-06-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Nava E.[6]
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[1]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-4
Mayo A.
Gojo B.[8]
7-656-1
Mayot H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Boyer T.
7-57-60
Zhukayev B.
Shepp A.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Williams C.
Yevseyev D.[7]
7-637-5
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
2-66-46-2
Jubb P.
Torres Espinosa J.
6-16-4
Van Assche L.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-3
Wong C.
Quinn E.
6-16-3
Tu L.
Matsuda R.
6-26-4