Paul Jubb vs Luca Van Assche — Lincoln CH Round of 16

Lincoln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2024
hard
Luca Van Assche
FRA4
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1681Hard ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
Jubb P.
6-3 6-1
Van Assche L.
Jubb P.
662
Van Assche L.
310

Paul Jubb defeated Luca Van Assche 6-3 6-1 in the Lincoln CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Van Assche L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Van Assche L.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Van Assche L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
38
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
91
Break points won·Dominant
6
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Van Assche L.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.5Hard Elo 1403
Surface ELO
8.5+278 Hard Elo edge
1.5Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
8.5Overall Elo 1701
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Van Assche L.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
77

Jubb P.: 20 days rest · Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.
Wong C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Fearnley J.
Yunchaokete B.[5]
0-66-07-63
Wong C.
Basavareddy N.
6-757-636-0
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.
Mayo A.
5-76-46-3
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Schoolkate T.
7-636-2
Basavareddy N.
Jubb P.
7-56-3
Wong C.
Tu L.
7-56-1
R16
Mayo A.
Smith C.
6-37-63
Tu L.
Baris O.
6-35-76-3
Fearnley J.
Eubanks C.[1]
7-54-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Mayot H.[3]
6-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Williams C.
6-36-0
Jubb P.
Van Assche L.[4]
6-36-1
Wong C.
Pinnington Jones J.
1-66-26-4
R32
Baris O.
Takahashi Y.
1-0
Fearnley J.
Brouwer G.
6-16-1
Smith C.
Lapadat J.
6-06-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Nava E.[6]
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[1]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-4
Mayo A.
Gojo B.[8]
7-656-1
Mayot H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.
Boyer T.
7-57-60
Zhukayev B.
Shepp A.
6-46-2
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Williams C.
Yevseyev D.[7]
7-637-5
Basavareddy N.
Kozlov S.
2-66-46-2
Jubb P.
Torres Espinosa J.
6-16-4
Van Assche L.[4]
Langmo C.
6-16-3
Wong C.
Quinn E.
6-16-3
Tu L.
Matsuda R.
6-26-4