Coleman Wong vs Matias Soto — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
HKG4
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
hard
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1323Hard ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Wong C.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Soto M.
Wong C.
6362
Soto M.
4631

Coleman Wong defeated Matias Soto 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #111.

Key context

  • Match story: Coleman Wong closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Soto M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Soto M.
37
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Soto M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Soto M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
43
34
Break points saved·Dominant
91
51
Break points won·Slight edge
5
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Soto M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+270 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Hard Elo 1323
7.7Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1421
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Soto M.
Freshness·Dominant
89
56

Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fonseca J.[6]
Tu L.[7]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Fonseca J.[6]
Grenier H.[5]
6-37-5
Tu L.[7]
Wong C.[4]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Grenier H.[5]
Tien L.
2-66-47-67
Fonseca J.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-2
Wong C.[4]
Braswell M.
6-47-63
Tu L.[7]
Nava E.[2]
7-656-3
R16
Braswell M.
Tomic B.[8]
W/O
Tien L.
Gea A.
4-67-676-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mayo A.
6-32-66-0
Diallo G.
Quinn E.
6-37-66
Fonseca J.[6]
Draxl L.
7-637-5
Wong C.[4]
Andrade A.
4-66-16-2
Tu L.[7]
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Nava E.[2]
Kumar O.
6-46-2
R32
Gea A.
Holt B.[9]
6-31-0
Mayo A.
Pinnington Jones J.
5-77-53-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mchugh A.
2-66-46-3
Andrade A.
Shimizu Y.
7-640-67-67
Tien L.
Noguchi R.
6-46-1
Diallo G.
Seggerman R.
7-633-66-1
Quinn E.
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-16-2
Draxl L.
Berankis R.
6-44-66-2
Fonseca J.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Tomic B.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-43-66-3
Braswell M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-646-3
Wong C.[4]
Soto M.
6-43-66-3
Tu L.[7]
Baadi T.
1-66-26-4
Trotter J.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Broom C.
7-56-3
Nava E.[2]
Saville L.
6-36-2