Alexander Weis vs Benoit Paire — San Marino CH Round of 32

San Marino CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
FRA
Benoit Paire
#1096ATP
1362ELO
1385Clay ELO
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Weis A.
6-2 6-1
Paire B.
Weis A.
662
Paire B.
210

Alexander Weis defeated Benoit Paire 6-2 6-1 in the San Marino CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alexander Weis came in ranked #620, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Weis A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Paire B.

Paire B.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Weis A.Paire B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
52%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
5.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (49 vs 65). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weis A.Paire B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
48
Break points saved·Dominant
50
90
Break points won·Clear edge
13
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Weis A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Paire B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Muller A.[3]
Tseng C.
6-34-67-63
Semi-finals
Muller A.[3]
Fognini F.[1]
6-27-5
Tseng C.
Comesana F.[2]
4-66-16-3
Quarter-finals
Fognini F.[1]
Gigante M.[5]
7-56-2
Comesana F.[2]
Pellegrino A.[7]
6-26-2
Muller A.[3]
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Heide G.[6]
7-626-2
R16
Tseng C.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-46-3
Muller A.[3]
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Pellegrino A.[7]
Weis A.
6-16-716-2
Fognini F.[1]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
1-67-656-0
Comesana F.[2]
Hardt N.
6-726-46-4
Gigante M.[5]
Jacquet K.
6-36-3
Heide G.[6]
Fatic N.
6-25-77-65
Cerundolo J.[8]
Cecchinato M.
6-47-62
R32
Fonio G.
Alves M.
7-627-62
Fognini F.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-756-16-2
Comesana F.[2]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-3
Muller A.[3]
Bertola R.
6-17-63
Lopez Montagud C.
Ramos A.[4]
1-66-26-2
Gigante M.[5]
Picchione A.
6-17-65
Heide G.[6]
Misolic F.
3-66-46-1
Pellegrino A.[7]
Kivattsev K.
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[8]
Bueno G.
6-26-1
Cecchinato M.
Collarini A.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Villanueva G.
6-37-5
Hardt N.
Janvier M.
6-16-3
Jacquet K.
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-1
Weis A.
Paire B.
6-26-1