Emilio Nava vs Luke Saville — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA2
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
hard
AUS
Luke Saville
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Nava E.
6-3 6-2
Saville L.
Nava E.
662
Saville L.
320

Emilio Nava defeated Luke Saville 6-3 6-2 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Saville L.

Saville L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Saville L.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Saville L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Saville L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
19
Break points saved·Dominant
94
69
Break points won·Slight edge
17
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
29
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
23
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Saville L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
2.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Saville L.
Freshness·
96
—

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fonseca J.[6]
Tu L.[7]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Fonseca J.[6]
Grenier H.[5]
6-37-5
Tu L.[7]
Wong C.[4]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Grenier H.[5]
Tien L.
2-66-47-67
Fonseca J.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-2
Wong C.[4]
Braswell M.
6-47-63
Tu L.[7]
Nava E.[2]
7-656-3
R16
Braswell M.
Tomic B.[8]
W/O
Tien L.
Gea A.
4-67-676-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mayo A.
6-32-66-0
Diallo G.
Quinn E.
6-37-66
Fonseca J.[6]
Draxl L.
7-637-5
Wong C.[4]
Andrade A.
4-66-16-2
Tu L.[7]
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Nava E.[2]
Kumar O.
6-46-2
R32
Gea A.
Holt B.[9]
6-31-0
Mayo A.
Pinnington Jones J.
5-77-53-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mchugh A.
2-66-46-3
Andrade A.
Shimizu Y.
7-640-67-67
Tien L.
Noguchi R.
6-46-1
Diallo G.
Seggerman R.
7-633-66-1
Quinn E.
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-16-2
Draxl L.
Berankis R.
6-44-66-2
Fonseca J.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Tomic B.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-43-66-3
Braswell M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-646-3
Wong C.[4]
Soto M.
6-43-66-3
Tu L.[7]
Baadi T.
1-66-26-4
Trotter J.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Broom C.
7-56-3
Nava E.[2]
Saville L.
6-36-2