August Holmgren vs Timofey Skatov — Porto CH Round of 16

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
DEN
August Holmgren
#143ATP
1566ELO
1517Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$646kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
hard
Timofey Skatov
KAZ8
Timofey Skatov
#172ATP
1544ELO
1479Hard ELO
$107kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLLWW
Holmgren A.
7-6 7-6
Skatov T.
Holmgren A.
78772
Skatov T.
66650

August Holmgren defeated Timofey Skatov 7-6 7-6 in the Porto CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — August Holmgren came in ranked #143.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holmgren A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Skatov T.

Skatov T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holmgren A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holmgren A.Skatov T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 157). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holmgren A.Skatov T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
81
Break points won·Dominant
0
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
46
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holmgren A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Skatov T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+37 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1479
5.1Overall Elo 1566
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1544
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
4.2
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holmgren A.Skatov T.
Freshness·Slight edge
83
92

Holmgren A.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d) · Skatov T.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Holmgren A.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-637-66
Andreev A.[6]
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Moro Canas A.[6]
Faria J.[5]
6-34-1
Holmgren A.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-767-57-65
Taberner C.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
5-76-06-0
Andreev A.[6]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.[3]
Martinez A.
6-46-1
Moro Canas A.[6]
Butvilas E.
4-67-686-4
Faria J.[5]
Ursu V.
6-766-37-5
Holmgren A.
Reymond A.
6-24-66-3
Taberner C.[4]
Prizmic D.
6-31-66-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Dalla Valle E.
7-57-5
Andreev A.[6]
Cukierman D.
7-676-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Masur D.
7-676-4
R16
Holmgren A.
Skatov T.[8]
7-667-65
Faria J.[5]
Domingues J.
0-66-36-4
Butvilas E.
Klein L.[1]
6-47-68
Moro Canas A.[6]
Blockx A.
7-606-4
Ursu V.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Martinez A.
Rocha H.[7]
6-26-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
De Loore J.
7-646-3
Reymond A.
Kachmazov A.
6-47-64
Prizmic D.
Mager G.[7]
2-0
Dalla Valle E.
Faria J.[2]
6-13-67-65
Masur D.
Rocha H.[3]
4-66-16-4
Taberner C.[4]
Echargui M.
6-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.[6]
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Cukierman D.
Forejtek J.
3-66-46-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Barton H.
6-36-4
R32
De Loore J.
Royer V.
7-656-737-65
Kachmazov A.
Sanchez Quilez A.
6-17-5
Skatov T.[8]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-3
Domingues J.
Marie J.
6-36-1
Butvilas E.
Bertrand R.
6-26-3
Martinez A.
Searle H.
7-6115-76-3
Klein L.[1]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-746-1
Blockx A.
Dougaz A.
6-46-2
Moro Canas A.[6]
Escoffier A.
4-67-56-1
Ursu V.
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Elias G.
Fanselow S.
6-37-61
Faria J.[5]
Piros Z.
6-16-2
Rocha H.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-26-4
Kukushkin M.[3]
Cui J.
3-66-26-1
Holmgren A.
Geerts M.
6-41-66-3
Reymond A.
Olivo R.
7-656-2
Cukierman D.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-647-65
Rocha H.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-16-2
Valkusz M.
Moeller M.
6-26-4
Andreev A.[6]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
Forejtek J.
Roca Batalla O.[1]
6-24-67-5
Faria J.[2]
Giustino L.
6-17-67
Taberner C.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-56-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Gadamauri B.
6-32-67-64
Mager G.[7]
Krutykh O.
6-47-64
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Kirkin E.[8]
6-36-0
Barton H.
Gakhov I.
6-26-2
Dalla Valle E.
Habib H.
7-656-3
Echargui M.
Campana Lee G.
6-746-46-3
Masur D.
Sakamoto P.
6-22-66-2
Neumayer L.
Fanselow S.
4-66-26-1
Prizmic D.
Elias G.
6-47-5