August Holmgren vs Michael Geerts — Porto CH Round of 32

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
DEN
August Holmgren
#143ATP
1566ELO
1517Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$646kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#333ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWL
Holmgren A.
6-4 1-6 6-3
Geerts M.
Holmgren A.
6162
Geerts M.
4631

August Holmgren defeated Michael Geerts 6-4 1-6 6-3 in the Porto CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — August Holmgren came in ranked #143.

Key context

  • Match story: August Holmgren closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holmgren A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Holmgren A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holmgren A.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holmgren A.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
82
Break points won·Even
0
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holmgren A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+134 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1383
6.7Overall Elo 1566
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holmgren A.Geerts M.
Freshness·
85
—

Holmgren A.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Holmgren A.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-637-66
Andreev A.[6]
Taberner C.[4]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Moro Canas A.[6]
Faria J.[5]
6-34-1
Holmgren A.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-767-57-65
Taberner C.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
5-76-06-0
Andreev A.[6]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.[3]
Martinez A.
6-46-1
Moro Canas A.[6]
Butvilas E.
4-67-686-4
Faria J.[5]
Ursu V.
6-766-37-5
Holmgren A.
Reymond A.
6-24-66-3
Taberner C.[4]
Prizmic D.
6-31-66-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Dalla Valle E.
7-57-5
Andreev A.[6]
Cukierman D.
7-676-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Masur D.
7-676-4
R16
Holmgren A.
Skatov T.[8]
7-667-65
Faria J.[5]
Domingues J.
0-66-36-4
Butvilas E.
Klein L.[1]
6-47-68
Moro Canas A.[6]
Blockx A.
7-606-4
Ursu V.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Martinez A.
Rocha H.[7]
6-26-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
De Loore J.
7-646-3
Reymond A.
Kachmazov A.
6-47-64
Prizmic D.
Mager G.[7]
2-0
Dalla Valle E.
Faria J.[2]
6-13-67-65
Masur D.
Rocha H.[3]
4-66-16-4
Taberner C.[4]
Echargui M.
6-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Andreev A.[6]
Valkusz M.
6-46-2
Cukierman D.
Forejtek J.
3-66-46-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Barton H.
6-36-4
R32
De Loore J.
Royer V.
7-656-737-65
Kachmazov A.
Sanchez Quilez A.
6-17-5
Skatov T.[8]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-3
Domingues J.
Marie J.
6-36-1
Butvilas E.
Bertrand R.
6-26-3
Martinez A.
Searle H.
7-6115-76-3
Klein L.[1]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-746-1
Blockx A.
Dougaz A.
6-46-2
Moro Canas A.[6]
Escoffier A.
4-67-56-1
Ursu V.
Rocha F.
6-16-4
Elias G.
Fanselow S.
6-37-61
Faria J.[5]
Piros Z.
6-16-2
Rocha H.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-26-4
Kukushkin M.[3]
Cui J.
3-66-26-1
Holmgren A.
Geerts M.
6-41-66-3
Reymond A.
Olivo R.
7-656-2
Cukierman D.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-647-65
Rocha H.[3]
Oliel Y.
6-16-2
Valkusz M.
Moeller M.
6-26-4
Andreev A.[6]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-46-4
Forejtek J.
Roca Batalla O.[1]
6-24-67-5
Faria J.[2]
Giustino L.
6-17-67
Taberner C.[4]
Agamenone F.
7-56-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
Gadamauri B.
6-32-67-64
Mager G.[7]
Krutykh O.
6-47-64
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Kirkin E.[8]
6-36-0
Barton H.
Gakhov I.
6-26-2
Dalla Valle E.
Habib H.
7-656-3
Echargui M.
Campana Lee G.
6-746-46-3
Masur D.
Sakamoto P.
6-22-66-2
Neumayer L.
Fanselow S.
4-66-26-1
Prizmic D.
Elias G.
6-47-5