Kyrian Jacquet vs Vilius Gaubas — San Marino CH Round of 32

San Marino CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kyrian Jacquet
FRA
Kyrian Jacquet
#130ATP
1685ELO
1586Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
LTU
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1535Clay ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
Jacquet K.
6-3 6-2
Gaubas V.
Jacquet K.
662
Gaubas V.
320

Kyrian Jacquet defeated Vilius Gaubas 6-3 6-2 in the San Marino CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Kyrian Jacquet came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 16. Kyrian Jacquet extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-30WimbledonR128grassKyrian Jacquet6-3 6-4 7.7-6.2
2025-06-30WimbledonQ2grassKyrian Jacquet6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Jacquet K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Gaubas V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Jacquet K.

Serve advantage — Jacquet K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jacquet K.Gaubas V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jacquet K.Gaubas V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
47
57
Break points saved·Even
87
87
Break points won·Dominant
27
52
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jacquet K.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gaubas V.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3+52 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.7Clay Elo 1535
5.2Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1581
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
7.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
2.7
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jacquet K.Gaubas V.
Freshness·Clear edge
84
70

Jacquet K.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d) · Gaubas V.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Muller A.[3]
Tseng C.
6-34-67-63
Semi-finals
Muller A.[3]
Fognini F.[1]
6-27-5
Tseng C.
Comesana F.[2]
4-66-16-3
Quarter-finals
Fognini F.[1]
Gigante M.[5]
7-56-2
Comesana F.[2]
Pellegrino A.[7]
6-26-2
Muller A.[3]
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Heide G.[6]
7-626-2
R16
Tseng C.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-46-3
Muller A.[3]
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Pellegrino A.[7]
Weis A.
6-16-716-2
Fognini F.[1]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
1-67-656-0
Comesana F.[2]
Hardt N.
6-726-46-4
Gigante M.[5]
Jacquet K.
6-36-3
Heide G.[6]
Fatic N.
6-25-77-65
Cerundolo J.[8]
Cecchinato M.
6-47-62
R32
Fonio G.
Alves M.
7-627-62
Fognini F.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-756-16-2
Comesana F.[2]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-3
Muller A.[3]
Bertola R.
6-17-63
Lopez Montagud C.
Ramos A.[4]
1-66-26-2
Gigante M.[5]
Picchione A.
6-17-65
Heide G.[6]
Misolic F.
3-66-46-1
Pellegrino A.[7]
Kivattsev K.
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[8]
Bueno G.
6-26-1
Cecchinato M.
Collarini A.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Villanueva G.
6-37-5
Hardt N.
Janvier M.
6-16-3
Jacquet K.
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-1
Weis A.
Paire B.
6-26-1