Joao Fonseca vs Li Tu — Lexington CH Final

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Joao Fonseca
BRA6
Joao Fonseca
#27ATP
1928ELO
1914Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$3.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
hard
AUS7
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Fonseca J.
6-1 6-4
Tu L.
Fonseca J.
662
Tu L.
140

Joao Fonseca defeated Li Tu 6-1 6-4 in the Lexington CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Joao Fonseca came in ranked #27.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fonseca J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Fonseca J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fonseca J.Tu L.
48
Serve
—
38
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fonseca J.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (129 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fonseca J.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
82
Break points won·Dominant
43
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fonseca J.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tu L.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+443 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1471
10.0Overall Elo 1928
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fonseca J.Tu L.
Freshness·
94
—

Fonseca J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fonseca J.[6]
Tu L.[7]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Fonseca J.[6]
Grenier H.[5]
6-37-5
Tu L.[7]
Wong C.[4]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Grenier H.[5]
Tien L.
2-66-47-67
Fonseca J.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-2
Wong C.[4]
Braswell M.
6-47-63
Tu L.[7]
Nava E.[2]
7-656-3
R16
Braswell M.
Tomic B.[8]
W/O
Tien L.
Gea A.
4-67-676-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mayo A.
6-32-66-0
Diallo G.
Quinn E.
6-37-66
Fonseca J.[6]
Draxl L.
7-637-5
Wong C.[4]
Andrade A.
4-66-16-2
Tu L.[7]
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Nava E.[2]
Kumar O.
6-46-2
R32
Gea A.
Holt B.[9]
6-31-0
Mayo A.
Pinnington Jones J.
5-77-53-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mchugh A.
2-66-46-3
Andrade A.
Shimizu Y.
7-640-67-67
Tien L.
Noguchi R.
6-46-1
Diallo G.
Seggerman R.
7-633-66-1
Quinn E.
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-16-2
Draxl L.
Berankis R.
6-44-66-2
Fonseca J.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Tomic B.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-43-66-3
Braswell M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-646-3
Wong C.[4]
Soto M.
6-43-66-3
Tu L.[7]
Baadi T.
1-66-26-4
Trotter J.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Broom C.
7-56-3
Nava E.[2]
Saville L.
6-36-2