Fabio Fognini vs Matteo Gigante — San Marino CH Quarter-final

San Marino CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA1
Fabio Fognini
39 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
Matteo Gigante
ITA5
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Fognini F.
7-5 6-2
Gigante M.
Fognini F.
762
Gigante M.
520

Fabio Fognini defeated Matteo Gigante 7-5 6-2 in the San Marino CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Fabio Fognini came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Fabio Fognini closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fognini F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fognini F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fognini F.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fognini F.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
78
Break points won·Dominant
81
35
Deciding sets·Even
93
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fognini F.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gigante M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Muller A.[3]
Tseng C.
6-34-67-63
Semi-finals
Muller A.[3]
Fognini F.[1]
6-27-5
Tseng C.
Comesana F.[2]
4-66-16-3
Quarter-finals
Fognini F.[1]
Gigante M.[5]
7-56-2
Comesana F.[2]
Pellegrino A.[7]
6-26-2
Muller A.[3]
Cerundolo J.[8]
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Heide G.[6]
7-626-2
R16
Tseng C.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-46-3
Muller A.[3]
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Pellegrino A.[7]
Weis A.
6-16-716-2
Fognini F.[1]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
1-67-656-0
Comesana F.[2]
Hardt N.
6-726-46-4
Gigante M.[5]
Jacquet K.
6-36-3
Heide G.[6]
Fatic N.
6-25-77-65
Cerundolo J.[8]
Cecchinato M.
6-47-62
R32
Fonio G.
Alves M.
7-627-62
Fognini F.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-756-16-2
Comesana F.[2]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-3
Muller A.[3]
Bertola R.
6-17-63
Lopez Montagud C.
Ramos A.[4]
1-66-26-2
Gigante M.[5]
Picchione A.
6-17-65
Heide G.[6]
Misolic F.
3-66-46-1
Pellegrino A.[7]
Kivattsev K.
6-47-5
Cerundolo J.[8]
Bueno G.
6-26-1
Cecchinato M.
Collarini A.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Villanueva G.
6-37-5
Hardt N.
Janvier M.
6-16-3
Jacquet K.
Gaubas V.
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Maestrelli F.
6-36-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-1
Weis A.
Paire B.
6-26-1