Omni Kumar vs Charles Broom — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Omni Kumar
24 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Kumar O.
7-5 6-3
Broom C.
Kumar O.
762
Broom C.
530

Omni Kumar defeated Charles Broom 7-5 6-3 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Omni Kumar closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kumar O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kumar O.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kumar O.Broom C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kumar O.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Broom C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.9
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
5.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fonseca J.[6]
Tu L.[7]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Fonseca J.[6]
Grenier H.[5]
6-37-5
Tu L.[7]
Wong C.[4]
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Grenier H.[5]
Tien L.
2-66-47-67
Fonseca J.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-2
Wong C.[4]
Braswell M.
6-47-63
Tu L.[7]
Nava E.[2]
7-656-3
R16
Braswell M.
Tomic B.[8]
W/O
Tien L.
Gea A.
4-67-676-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mayo A.
6-32-66-0
Diallo G.
Quinn E.
6-37-66
Fonseca J.[6]
Draxl L.
7-637-5
Wong C.[4]
Andrade A.
4-66-16-2
Tu L.[7]
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Nava E.[2]
Kumar O.
6-46-2
R32
Gea A.
Holt B.[9]
6-31-0
Mayo A.
Pinnington Jones J.
5-77-53-0
Grenier H.[5]
Mchugh A.
2-66-46-3
Andrade A.
Shimizu Y.
7-640-67-67
Tien L.
Noguchi R.
6-46-1
Diallo G.
Seggerman R.
7-633-66-1
Quinn E.
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-16-2
Draxl L.
Berankis R.
6-44-66-2
Fonseca J.[6]
Uchida K.
6-36-3
Tomic B.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-43-66-3
Braswell M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-646-3
Wong C.[4]
Soto M.
6-43-66-3
Tu L.[7]
Baadi T.
1-66-26-4
Trotter J.
Wu T.
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Broom C.
7-56-3
Nava E.[2]
Saville L.
6-36-2