Magda Linette vs Mirra Andreeva — Paris Olympics Round of 64

Paris Olympics · WTA · Round of 64
Magda Linette
POL
Magda Linette
#51WTA
1831ELO
1765Clay ELO
$732kYTD
$8.8MCAREER
34 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2024
clay
Mirra Andreeva
RUS
Mirra Andreeva
#5WTA
2074ELO
2034Clay ELO
$5.4MYTD
$13MCAREER
19 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
Linette M.
6-3 6-4
Andreeva M.
Linette M.
662
Andreeva M.
340

Magda Linette defeated Mirra Andreeva 6-3 6-4 in the Paris Olympics round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mirra Andreeva came in ranked #5, leading the head-to-head 4–0, but Magda Linette had arrived on a 5-match winning run. Magda Linette claimed a first win over Mirra Andreeva in five meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Magda Linette closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

0–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-06-29WimbledonR128grassMirra Andreeva5-7 4-6
2026-02-08DohaR32hardMirra Andreeva7-6(0) 6-1
2024-09-25BeijingR16hardMirra Andreeva6-1 6-3
2023-04-24MadridR32clayMirra Andreeva6-3 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Linette M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Andreeva M.

Andreeva M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Linette M.

Serve advantage — Andreeva M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Linette M.Andreeva M.
—
Serve
62
—
Return
18

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Linette M.Andreeva M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
46%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 135). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Linette M.Andreeva M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
79
94
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
96
Break points won·Dominant
75
100
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
88
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Linette M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Andreeva M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
2.0Clay Elo 1765
Surface ELO
8.0+269 Clay Elo edge
2.1Overall Elo 1831
ELO gap
7.9Overall Elo 2074
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.4
Surface form
9.3
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
4.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Linette M.Andreeva M.
Freshness·Even
98
94

Linette M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Andreeva M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Bronze
Swiatek I.[1]
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-1
Final
Zheng Q.
Vekic D.[13]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Vekic D.[13]
Schmiedlova A.
6-46-0
Zheng Q.
Swiatek I.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Collins D.[8]
6-12-64-1
Schmiedlova A.
Krejcikova B.[9]
6-46-2
Zheng Q.
Kerber A.
6-746-47-66
Vekic D.[13]
Kostyuk M.[12]
6-42-67-68
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Wang X.
6-36-4
Collins D.[8]
Osorio C.
6-04-66-3
Kerber A.
Fernandez L.[16]
6-46-3
Zheng Q.
Navarro E.[11]
6-777-646-1
Kostyuk M.[12]
Sakkari M.[7]
4-67-656-4
Vekic D.[13]
Gauff C.[2]
7-676-2
Schmiedlova A.
Paolini J.[4]
7-53-67-5
Krejcikova B.[9]
Svitolina E.
7-652-66-4
R32
Krejcikova B.[9]
Wang X.
6-36-2
Sakkari M.[7]
Yuan Y.
6-26-1
Vekic D.[13]
Andreescu B.
6-36-4
Navarro E.[11]
Tomova V.
6-756-46-1
Swiatek I.[1]
Parry D.
6-16-1
Wang X.
Shnaider D.[15]
6-36-1
Fernandez L.[16]
Bucsa C.
7-646-3
Zheng Q.
Rus A.
6-26-4
Collins D.[8]
Wozniacki C.
6-33-66-3
Kerber A.
Cristian J.
6-43-66-4
Schmiedlova A.
Haddad Maia B.[14]
6-46-4
Osorio C.
Yastremska D.
7-646-4
Paolini J.[4]
Linette M.
6-46-1
Gauff C.[2]
Carle M.
6-16-1
Kostyuk M.[12]
Burel C.
7-636-2
Svitolina E.
Pegula J.[5]
4-66-16-3
R64
Collins D.[8]
Siegemund L.
6-32-0
Wang X.
Noskova L.
6-36-3
Tomova V.
Frech M.
6-47-64
Vekic D.[13]
Bronzetti L.
6-27-5
Sakkari M.[7]
Kovinic D.
6-06-1
Parry D.
Podoroska N.
7-667-5
Osorio C.
Ostapenko J.[10]
6-46-3
Yastremska D.
Pigossi L.
3-67-56-0
Bucsa C.
Martic P.
6-46-3
Burel C.
Siniakova K.
7-636-4
Kostyuk M.[12]
Sun L.
6-46-3
Linette M.
Andreeva M.
6-36-4
Wang X.
Korpatsch T.
6-26-1
Schmiedlova A.
Boulter K.
6-46-2
Rus A.
Gadecki O.
6-46-1
Zheng Q.
Errani S.
6-06-0
Pegula J.[5]
Golubic V.
6-36-4
Krejcikova B.[9]
Sorribes Tormo S.
4-66-07-63
Yuan Y.
Alexandrova E.
7-56-706-2
Svitolina E.
Uchijima M.
6-26-1
Kerber A.
Osaka N.
7-56-3
Gauff C.[2]
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-0
Navarro E.[11]
Grabher J.
6-26-0
Haddad Maia B.[14]
Gracheva V.
6-44-66-0
Wozniacki C.
Sherif M.
2-67-56-1
Andreescu B.
Tauson C.
6-26-3
Paolini J.[4]
Bogdan A.
7-56-3
Swiatek I.[1]
Begu I.
6-27-5
Fernandez L.[16]
Muchova K.
6-14-66-2
Shnaider D.[15]
Cocciaretto E.
6-27-5
Carle M.
Maria T.
6-06-0
Cristian J.
Garcia C.[17]
5-76-36-4