Carlos Taberner vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
clay
BOL2
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Taberner C.
4-6 6-3 6-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Taberner C.
4662
Dellien Velasco M.
6331

Carlos Taberner defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 4-6 6-3 6-3 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Even
1.5
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
19
Break points saved·Dominant
74
28
Break points won·Dominant
59
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
63
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
22
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Dellien Velasco M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+237 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Clay Elo 1368
7.9Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1379
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
7.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
5.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rincon D.[9]
Hemery C.[4]
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Rincon D.[9]
Boitan G.
7-666-4
Hemery C.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
6-26-746-3
Quarter-finals
Boitan G.
Dougaz A.[6]
6-37-62
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Comesana F.[1]
6-27-5
Hemery C.[4]
Moeller M.
5-76-26-4
Rincon D.[9]
Taberner C.
7-56-4
R16
Dougaz A.[6]
Onclin G.
7-56-3
Comesana F.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-35-76-1
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Hemery C.[4]
Ahti V.
6-16-0
Moeller M.
Tabur C.[8]
6-46-3
Boitan G.
Popko D.[3]
3-66-36-3
Rincon D.[9]
Sels J.
2-66-46-1
Taberner C.
Torres J.
6-26-3
R32
Torres J.
Kirkin E.
7-656-2
Rincon D.[9]
Clarke J.
7-52-0
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Fonio G.
7-656-2
Dougaz A.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Comesana F.[1]
Vesely J.
2-66-36-3
Lamasine T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-637-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Vrbensky M.
6-46-3
Hemery C.[4]
Erhard M.
6-42-67-65
Ahti V.
Vasa E.
4-67-637-5
Moeller M.
Kaukovalta P.
6-36-2
Tabur C.[8]
Gentzsch T.
6-36-3
Onclin G.
Laaksonen H.
6-36-4
Boitan G.
Barton H.
6-30-66-2
Popko D.[3]
Mena F.
4-66-37-5
Sels J.
Gakhov I.
7-57-65
Taberner C.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
4-66-36-3