Juncheng Shang vs Max Purcell — Atlanta Quarter-final

Atlanta · ATP · Quarter-final
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
hard
AUS8
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Shang J.
7-6 6-4
Purcell M.
Shang J.
7762
Purcell M.
6340

Juncheng Shang defeated Max Purcell 7-6 6-4 in the Atlanta quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Purcell M.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.6
7.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
59
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Dominant
45
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
84
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Purcell M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.
Thompson J.[4]
4-67-626-2
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.
Rinderknech A.
6-34-66-4
Thompson J.[4]
Shang J.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Shang J.
Purcell M.[8]
7-636-4
Thompson J.[4]
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
7-654-66-3
Nishioka Y.
Tiafoe F.[3]
7-626-2
Rinderknech A.
Bellucci M.
7-653-66-1
R16
Rinderknech A.
Walton A.
7-646-3
Shang J.
Shelton B.[1]
7-666-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Opelka R.
7-57-5
Bellucci M.
Mannarino A.[2]
7-664-66-3
Purcell M.[8]
Goffin D.
6-36-3
Thompson J.[4]
Mayot H.
6-27-5
Nishioka Y.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Tiafoe F.[3]
Karatsev A.
6-43-66-3
R32
Mcdonald M.
Nakashima B.[7]
6-26-4
Bellucci M.
Vukic A.
1-66-43-1
Mayot H.
Coric B.
7-696-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Cazaux A.
6-27-64
Purcell M.[8]
Oconnell C.
4-67-56-2
Nishioka Y.
Svajda Z.
7-646-3
Shang J.
Martin A.
6-16-1
Goffin D.
Shapovalov D.
6-43-66-1
Opelka R.
Kovacevic A.
6-37-65
Karatsev A.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Walton A.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Wolf J.
6-36-2