Jakub Mensik vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Umag Quarter-final

Umag · ATP · Quarter-final
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#19ATP
1931ELO
1861Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Mensik J.
6-0 6-4
Tseng C.
Mensik J.
662
Tseng C.
040

Jakub Mensik defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 6-0 6-4 in the Umag quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jakub Mensik came in ranked #19.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mensik J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mensik J.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mensik J.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
83
Break points won·Dominant
77
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mensik J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Tseng C.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.6+320 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Clay Elo 1541
10.0Overall Elo 1931
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1554
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mensik J.Tseng C.
Freshness·
90
—

Mensik J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo F.[4]
Musetti L.[2]
2-66-47-65
Semi-finals
Musetti L.[2]
Mensik J.
6-46-1
Cerundolo F.[4]
Rublev A.[1]
7-666-4
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[1]
Marozsan F.[6]
5-76-36-2
Cerundolo F.[4]
Sonego L.
6-42-67-62
Musetti L.[2]
Lajovic D.
5-76-36-0
Mensik J.
Tseng C.
6-06-4
R16
Cerundolo F.[4]
Dodig M.
6-36-4
Lajovic D.
Cobolli F.[1]
7-657-63
Tseng C.
Fognini F.
6-16-0
Musetti L.[2]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Marozsan F.[6]
Monteiro T.
6-27-67
Mensik J.
Darderi L.[5]
6-46-3
Rublev A.[1]
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-47-5
Sonego L.
Muller A.
7-56-1
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
Mikrut L.
6-27-5
Cobolli F.[1]
Navone M.[6]
6-26-3
Fognini F.
Van Assche L.
6-46-3
Lajovic D.
Misolic F.
6-43-66-2
Trungelliti M.
Andreozzi G.
4-66-36-2
Marozsan F.[6]
Shevchenko A.
6-44-67-68
Monteiro T.
Machac T.[7]
3-66-36-4
Dodig M.
Couacaud E.
3-66-36-2
Muller A.
Arnaldi M.[4]
7-686-4
Sonego L.
Poljicak M.
6-26-717-69
Darderi L.[5]
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-4
Mensik J.
Popyrin A.
6-36-2