Jesper De Jong vs Gianluca Mager — Verona CH Round of 32

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jesper De Jong
NED2
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
clay
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
De Jong J.
6-4 7-5
Mager G.
De Jong J.
672
Mager G.
450

Jesper De Jong defeated Gianluca Mager 6-4 7-5 in the Verona CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Mager G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Mager G.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Mager G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.2
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Mager G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
40
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Dominant
37
4
Deciding sets·Even
69
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
57
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mager G.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.8
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Mager G.
Freshness·
92
—

De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Arnaboldi F.
Gaubas V.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Arnaboldi F.
Rehberg M.
6-26-1
Gaubas V.
Basilashvili N.
4-66-07-5
Quarter-finals
Basilashvili N.
De Jong J.[2]
6-44-66-1
Rehberg M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-43-67-5
Arnaboldi F.
Bueno G.
6-26-4
Gaubas V.
Dellien H.[5]
6-31-66-3
R16
Dellien H.[5]
Krajinovic F.
7-626-3
Basilashvili N.
Berrettini J.
6-36-3
Guillen Meza A.
Maestrelli F.
6-43-66-3
Rehberg M.
Pellegrino A.[6]
3-67-56-1
Bueno G.
Choinski J.
6-24-66-0
Arnaboldi F.
Blanchet U.[8]
6-42-66-0
Gaubas V.
Gasquet R.[4]
7-634-67-66
De Jong J.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-1
R32
Basilashvili N.
Andreev A.
6-10-0
Maestrelli F.
Cachin P.[1]
7-637-5
Guillen Meza A.
Jacquet K.
6-27-62
Rehberg M.
Jianu F.
7-646-1
Pellegrino A.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-747-616-4
Choinski J.
Squire H.[9]
6-746-27-5
Bueno G.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-777-56-3
Arnaboldi F.
Nesterov P.
6-36-4
Blanchet U.[8]
Fatic N.
6-37-62
Dellien H.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-727-56-1
Krajinovic F.
Picchione A.
6-46-4
Gaubas V.
Dalla Valle E.
4-67-56-1
Gasquet R.[4]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-03-66-2
Berrettini J.
Moro Canas A.[7]
3-66-26-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Sciahbasi L.
6-16-1
De Jong J.[2]
Mager G.
6-47-5