Omar Jasika vs Matteo Gigante — Zug CH Round of 32

Zug CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Omar Jasika
#531ATP
1296ELO
1245Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
clay
Matteo Gigante
ITA2
Matteo Gigante
#521ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Jasika O.
6-2 7-5
Gigante M.
Jasika O.
672
Gigante M.
250

Omar Jasika defeated Matteo Gigante 6-2 7-5 in the Zug CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Matteo Gigante came in ranked #521, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Omar Jasika closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Gigante M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
58
Break points saved·Dominant
47
78
Break points won·Clear edge
13
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Gigante M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.7Clay Elo 1245
Surface ELO
9.3+353 Clay Elo edge
1.6Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
8.4Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.1
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.4
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kym J.
Burruchaga R.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Burruchaga R.[3]
Huesler M.
3-66-16-4
Kym J.
De Loore J.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.[3]
Shelbayh A.
6-16-4
De Loore J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Bernet H.
6-46-4
Kym J.
Topo M.
5-77-6107-66
R16
Kym J.
Majchrzak K.
6-47-65
Huesler M.
Brunold M.
6-36-1
Bernet H.
Varillas J.[6]
7-56-3
Burruchaga R.[3]
Blockx A.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.
Halys Q.
6-36-4
De Loore J.
Jasika O.
6-47-67
Shelbayh A.
Molleker R.
6-46-2
Topo M.
Vallejo A.
4-66-36-3
R32
Molleker R.
Stricker D.[8]
7-626-737-65
Jasika O.
Gigante M.[2]
6-27-5
Blockx A.
Alves M.
6-43-66-4
Brunold M.
Van De Zandschulp B.[1]
7-653-67-65
Burruchaga R.[3]
Dietrich D.
6-777-57-62
Kym J.
Cerundolo J.[4]
6-46-0
Vallejo A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-36-4
Varillas J.[6]
Bertola R.
7-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Martineau M.[7]
7-663-67-5
Bernet H.
Nijboer R.
4-67-56-4
De Loore J.
Janvier M.
6-27-63
Halys Q.
Paire B.
6-37-67
Huesler M.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-06-3
Majchrzak K.
Kasnikowski M.
7-636-3
Shelbayh A.
Paul J.
4-66-37-68
Topo M.
Wenger D.
6-36-2