Javier Barranco Cosano vs Francisco Comesana — Tampere CH Quarter-final

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP5
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
clay
Francisco Comesana
ARG1
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Barranco Cosano J.
6-2 7-5
Comesana F.
Barranco Cosano J.
672
Comesana F.
250

Javier Barranco Cosano defeated Francisco Comesana 6-2 7-5 in the Tampere CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Francisco Comesana came in ranked #94.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Comesana F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Barranco Cosano J.Comesana F.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Comesana F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
6.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Comesana F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
56
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
90
Break points won·Even
33
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Comesana F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Clay Elo 1441
Surface ELO
7.1+215 Clay Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1695
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.3
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Barranco Cosano J.Comesana F.
Freshness·
—
90

Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rincon D.[9]
Hemery C.[4]
6-17-64
Semi-finals
Rincon D.[9]
Boitan G.
7-666-4
Hemery C.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
6-26-746-3
Quarter-finals
Boitan G.
Dougaz A.[6]
6-37-62
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Comesana F.[1]
6-27-5
Hemery C.[4]
Moeller M.
5-76-26-4
Rincon D.[9]
Taberner C.
7-56-4
R16
Dougaz A.[6]
Onclin G.
7-56-3
Comesana F.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-35-76-1
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Hemery C.[4]
Ahti V.
6-16-0
Moeller M.
Tabur C.[8]
6-46-3
Boitan G.
Popko D.[3]
3-66-36-3
Rincon D.[9]
Sels J.
2-66-46-1
Taberner C.
Torres J.
6-26-3
R32
Torres J.
Kirkin E.
7-656-2
Rincon D.[9]
Clarke J.
7-52-0
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Fonio G.
7-656-2
Dougaz A.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Comesana F.[1]
Vesely J.
2-66-36-3
Lamasine T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-637-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Vrbensky M.
6-46-3
Hemery C.[4]
Erhard M.
6-42-67-65
Ahti V.
Vasa E.
4-67-637-5
Moeller M.
Kaukovalta P.
6-36-2
Tabur C.[8]
Gentzsch T.
6-36-3
Onclin G.
Laaksonen H.
6-36-4
Boitan G.
Barton H.
6-30-66-2
Popko D.[3]
Mena F.
4-66-37-5
Sels J.
Gakhov I.
7-57-65
Taberner C.
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
4-66-36-3