Mika Brunold vs Botic Van De ZandschulpZug CH Round of 32

Zug CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
#408ATP
1466ELO
1407Clay ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2024
clay
#54ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Brunold M.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Van De Zandschulp B.
Brunold M.
773772
Van De Zandschulp B.
656651

Mika Brunold defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Zug CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #54, leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Mika Brunold had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on clay. Mika Brunold claimed a first win over Botic Van De Zandschulp in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Mika Brunold closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

01
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-10-23BaselQ1hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-1 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Brunold M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Brunold M.Van De Zandschulp B.
Serve
33
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 144). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
77
Break points saved·Dominant
72
98
Break points won·Dominant
15
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.3Clay Elo 1407
Surface ELO
8.7+284 Clay Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1466
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1743
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
2.2
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
89

Van De Zandschulp B.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast