Eliot Spizzirri vs Li Tu — Newport Round of 32

Newport · ATP · Round of 32
Eliot Spizzirri
USA
Eliot Spizzirri
#105ATP
1796ELO
1630Grass ELO
$385kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
grass
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1516Grass ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Spizzirri E.
6-1 7-6
Tu L.
Spizzirri E.
6772
Tu L.
1640

Eliot Spizzirri defeated Li Tu 6-1 7-6 in the Newport round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Eliot Spizzirri came in ranked #105, defending last year's round of 32. Eliot Spizzirri claimed a first win over Li Tu in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Eliot Spizzirri came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-09StuttgartQ1grassLi Tu6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Spizzirri E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Spizzirri E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Spizzirri E.Tu L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (135 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Spizzirri E.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
27
Break points saved·Even
81
82
Break points won·Dominant
34
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Spizzirri E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tu L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+114 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Grass Elo 1516
8.5Overall Elo 1796
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1488
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Giron M.[2]
Michelsen A.[3]
6-746-37-5
Semi-finals
Giron M.[2]
Eubanks C.[4]
6-43-66-2
Michelsen A.[3]
Opelka R.
6-26-0
Quarter-finals
Giron M.[2]
Bolt A.
6-46-1
Opelka R.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-36-4
Eubanks C.[4]
Vukic A.[6]
6-24-67-63
Michelsen A.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4
R16
Kovacevic A.
Rinderknech A.[7]
6-33-67-5
Opelka R.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-43-66-4
Mcdonald M.
Harris B.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[3]
Cressy M.
6-46-4
Giron M.[2]
Paire B.
4-67-56-4
Vukic A.[6]
Spizzirri E.
6-27-63
Eubanks C.[4]
Quinn E.
7-643-66-3
Bolt A.
Nakashima B.[5]
7-626-4
R32
Spizzirri E.
Tu L.
6-17-64
Nakashima B.[5]
Nava E.
7-56-2
Bolt A.
Mensik J.
6-26-4
Paire B.
Svajda Z.
6-33-67-64
Cressy M.
Albot R.
6-44-67-64
Opelka R.
Lestienne C.
6-12-67-62
Harris B.
Diallo G.
7-647-5
Mcdonald M.
Hijikata R.[8]
4-67-646-2
Kovacevic A.
Mayot H.
7-616-4
Rinderknech A.[7]
Mochizuki S.
6-37-65
Vukic A.[6]
Wong C.
6-16-2
Quinn E.
Polmans M.
6-36-736-1