Qinwen Zheng vs Diane Parry — Palermo Semi-final

Palermo · WTA · Semi-final
Qinwen Zheng
CHN1
Qinwen Zheng
#135WTA
1852ELO
1811Clay ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
Diane Parry
FRA4
Diane Parry
#55WTA
1747ELO
1687Clay ELO
$515kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
23 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
Zheng Q.
7-5 6-4
Parry D.
Zheng Q.
762
Parry D.
540

Qinwen Zheng defeated Diane Parry 7-5 6-4 in the Palermo semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Qinwen Zheng came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Qinwen Zheng extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-17PalermoR16clayQinwen Zheng7-5 3-6 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Parry D.

Parry D.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Zheng Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Parry D.
1st serve in·Even
54%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Parry D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
93
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
84
Break points won·Dominant
100
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Parry D.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+124 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1687
8.6Overall Elo 1852
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1747
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Parry D.
Freshness·Slight edge
88
97

Zheng Q.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Parry D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 52%

Draw

Final
Zheng Q.[1]
Muchova K.[2]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Begu I.
6-16-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Parry D.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Sharma A.
7-657-66
Zheng Q.[1]
Cristian J.[7]
6-16-1
Begu I.
Li A.
6-36-4
Parry D.[4]
Paquet C.
7-51-66-4
R16
Muchova K.[2]
Noha Akugue N.
6-706-26-3
Paquet C.
Carle M.
6-36-1
Begu I.
Rus A.[5]
6-27-5
Cristian J.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-26-746-2
Sharma A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-43-66-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Martic P.
6-46-4
Li A.
Andreeva E.
6-34-66-4
R32
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-06-0
Carle M.
Maria T.[8]
5-76-16-1
Muchova K.[2]
Kawa K.
7-6145-1
Tomljanovic A.
Sherif M.
3-67-56-3
Sharma A.
Blinkova A.[6]
6-07-5
Martic P.
Arango E.
6-26-3
Cristian J.[7]
Riera J.
6-36-2
Rus A.[5]
Trevisan M.
6-756-46-2
Bronzetti L.
Jacquemot E.
7-53-66-3
Noha Akugue N.
Barthel M.
6-42-66-2
Zheng Q.[1]
Errani S.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Gadecki O.
4-66-46-4
Paquet C.
Zheng S.
6-36-3
Li A.
Stearns P.[3]
3-67-676-2
Teichmann J.
Ristic M.
6-16-1