Qinwen Zheng vs Petra Martic — Palermo Round of 16

Palermo · WTA · Round of 16
Qinwen Zheng
CHN1
Qinwen Zheng
#135WTA
1852ELO
1811Clay ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
CRO
Petra Martic
#1014WTA
1673ELO
1634Clay ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Zheng Q.
6-4 6-4
Martic P.
Zheng Q.
662
Martic P.
440

Qinwen Zheng defeated Petra Martic 6-4 6-4 in the Palermo round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Qinwen Zheng came in ranked #135, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Qinwen Zheng edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Zheng Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Martic P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
93
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
85
Break points won·Dominant
100
66
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
88
Tiebreaks·Even
89
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Martic P.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.8+178 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Clay Elo 1634
8.0Overall Elo 1852
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1673
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Martic P.
Freshness·
99
—

Zheng Q.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 52%

Draw

Final
Zheng Q.[1]
Muchova K.[2]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Begu I.
6-16-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Parry D.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Sharma A.
7-657-66
Zheng Q.[1]
Cristian J.[7]
6-16-1
Begu I.
Li A.
6-36-4
Parry D.[4]
Paquet C.
7-51-66-4
R16
Muchova K.[2]
Noha Akugue N.
6-706-26-3
Paquet C.
Carle M.
6-36-1
Begu I.
Rus A.[5]
6-27-5
Cristian J.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-26-746-2
Sharma A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-43-66-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Martic P.
6-46-4
Li A.
Andreeva E.
6-34-66-4
R32
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-06-0
Carle M.
Maria T.[8]
5-76-16-1
Muchova K.[2]
Kawa K.
7-6145-1
Tomljanovic A.
Sherif M.
3-67-56-3
Sharma A.
Blinkova A.[6]
6-07-5
Martic P.
Arango E.
6-26-3
Cristian J.[7]
Riera J.
6-36-2
Rus A.[5]
Trevisan M.
6-756-46-2
Bronzetti L.
Jacquemot E.
7-53-66-3
Noha Akugue N.
Barthel M.
6-42-66-2
Zheng Q.[1]
Errani S.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Gadecki O.
4-66-46-4
Paquet C.
Zheng S.
6-36-3
Li A.
Stearns P.[3]
3-67-676-2
Teichmann J.
Ristic M.
6-16-1