Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Joris De Loore — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
BEL7
Joris De Loore
#1076ATP
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
Zapata Miralles B.
6-3 6-7 6-3
De Loore J.
Zapata Miralles B.
66662
De Loore J.
37831

Bernabe Zapata Miralles defeated Joris De Loore 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Joris De Loore came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zapata Miralles B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs De Loore J.

De Loore J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Serve advantage — De Loore J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zapata Miralles B.De Loore J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
60%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.2
8.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zapata Miralles B.De Loore J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
84
Break points won·Dominant
80
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zapata Miralles B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
De Loore J.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Barrios Vera T.
Zakharov A.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.
Houkes M.
6-746-46-1
Zakharov A.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Houkes M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-47-5
Rincon D.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-1
Zakharov A.
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Barrios Vera T.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-646-1
R16
Guillen Meza A.
Cerundolo J.[1]
4-66-06-4
Dalla Valle E.
Planinsek F.
6-44-67-66
Rincon D.
Piros Z.[6]
6-23-66-3
Zakharov A.
Wassermann D.
4-66-06-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Vesely J.
6-36-4
Houkes M.
Moller E.
7-52-66-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Andreev A.
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.
Den Ouden G.
6-07-66
R32
Planinsek F.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-40-2
Wassermann D.
Martineau M.[4]
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Blockx A.
6-46-756-3
Guillen Meza A.
Agamenone F.
6-26-2
Rincon D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-3
Piros Z.[6]
Jasika O.
6-36-4
Zakharov A.
Sels J.
7-52-66-4
Dalla Valle E.
Travaglia S.
6-26-3
Vesely J.
Dellien H.[5]
6-46-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Deckers A.
4-67-666-4
Houkes M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Moller E.
Hassan B.[3]
6-06-766-3
Zapata Miralles B.
De Loore J.[7]
6-36-766-3
Andreev A.
Erhard M.
6-33-66-3
Den Ouden G.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-4
Barrios Vera T.
Rodionov J.[2]
7-616-1