Ann Li vs Peyton Stearns — Palermo Round of 32

Palermo · WTA · Round of 32
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#31WTA
1807ELO
1743Clay ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
Peyton Stearns
USA3
Peyton Stearns
#60WTA
1804ELO
1756Clay ELO
$476kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLL
Li A.
3-6 7-6 6-2
Stearns P.
Li A.
37962
Stearns P.
66721

Ann Li defeated Peyton Stearns 3-6 7-6 6-2 in the Palermo round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #31.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Stearns P.

Stearns P.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Li A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Li A.Stearns P.
19
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Stearns P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Stearns P.
Clutch Rating·Even
76
73
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
90
Break points won·Slight edge
87
98
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
51
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Stearns P.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 1743
Surface ELO
5.2+13 Clay Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1804
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
8.1
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Stearns P.
Freshness·Even
97
97

Li A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Stearns P.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 52%

Draw

Final
Zheng Q.[1]
Muchova K.[2]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Begu I.
6-16-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Parry D.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Sharma A.
7-657-66
Zheng Q.[1]
Cristian J.[7]
6-16-1
Begu I.
Li A.
6-36-4
Parry D.[4]
Paquet C.
7-51-66-4
R16
Muchova K.[2]
Noha Akugue N.
6-706-26-3
Paquet C.
Carle M.
6-36-1
Begu I.
Rus A.[5]
6-27-5
Cristian J.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-26-746-2
Sharma A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-43-66-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Martic P.
6-46-4
Li A.
Andreeva E.
6-34-66-4
R32
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-06-0
Carle M.
Maria T.[8]
5-76-16-1
Muchova K.[2]
Kawa K.
7-6145-1
Tomljanovic A.
Sherif M.
3-67-56-3
Sharma A.
Blinkova A.[6]
6-07-5
Martic P.
Arango E.
6-26-3
Cristian J.[7]
Riera J.
6-36-2
Rus A.[5]
Trevisan M.
6-756-46-2
Bronzetti L.
Jacquemot E.
7-53-66-3
Noha Akugue N.
Barthel M.
6-42-66-2
Zheng Q.[1]
Errani S.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Gadecki O.
4-66-46-4
Paquet C.
Zheng S.
6-36-3
Li A.
Stearns P.[3]
3-67-676-2
Teichmann J.
Ristic M.
6-16-1