Reilly Opelka vs Constant Lestienne — Newport Round of 32

Newport · ATP · Round of 32
Reilly Opelka
USA
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1635Grass ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
grass
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Opelka R.
6-1 2-6 7-6
Lestienne C.
Opelka R.
62772
Lestienne C.
16621

Reilly Opelka defeated Constant Lestienne 6-1 2-6 7-6 in the Newport round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Reilly Opelka came in ranked #131.

Key context

  • Match story: Reilly Opelka came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Opelka R.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Lestienne C.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Opelka R.Lestienne C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
60%
Return points won·Clear edge
28%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
72%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
17.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Opelka R.Lestienne C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
86
Break points won·Dominant
1
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
88
26
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
93
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Opelka R.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 259 days (−1.5)
Lestienne C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Giron M.[2]
Michelsen A.[3]
6-746-37-5
Semi-finals
Giron M.[2]
Eubanks C.[4]
6-43-66-2
Michelsen A.[3]
Opelka R.
6-26-0
Quarter-finals
Giron M.[2]
Bolt A.
6-46-1
Opelka R.
Mcdonald M.
4-66-36-4
Eubanks C.[4]
Vukic A.[6]
6-24-67-63
Michelsen A.[3]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4
R16
Kovacevic A.
Rinderknech A.[7]
6-33-67-5
Opelka R.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-43-66-4
Mcdonald M.
Harris B.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.[3]
Cressy M.
6-46-4
Giron M.[2]
Paire B.
4-67-56-4
Vukic A.[6]
Spizzirri E.
6-27-63
Eubanks C.[4]
Quinn E.
7-643-66-3
Bolt A.
Nakashima B.[5]
7-626-4
R32
Spizzirri E.
Tu L.
6-17-64
Nakashima B.[5]
Nava E.
7-56-2
Bolt A.
Mensik J.
6-26-4
Paire B.
Svajda Z.
6-33-67-64
Cressy M.
Albot R.
6-44-67-64
Opelka R.
Lestienne C.
6-12-67-62
Harris B.
Diallo G.
7-647-5
Mcdonald M.
Hijikata R.[8]
4-67-646-2
Kovacevic A.
Mayot H.
7-616-4
Rinderknech A.[7]
Mochizuki S.
6-37-65
Vukic A.[6]
Wong C.
6-16-2
Quinn E.
Polmans M.
6-36-736-1