Zsombor Piros vs Omar Jasika — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN6
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
AUS
Omar Jasika
#531ATP
1296ELO
1245Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Piros Z.
6-3 6-4
Jasika O.
Piros Z.
662
Jasika O.
340

Zsombor Piros defeated Omar Jasika 6-3 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
0
Break points saved·Dominant
84
47
Break points won·Clear edge
32
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
42
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
3.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
10.0+376 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1245
9.8Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1296
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
1.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
2.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Jasika O.
Freshness·
50
—

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Barrios Vera T.
Zakharov A.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.
Houkes M.
6-746-46-1
Zakharov A.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Houkes M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-47-5
Rincon D.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-1
Zakharov A.
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Barrios Vera T.
Zapata Miralles B.
7-646-1
R16
Guillen Meza A.
Cerundolo J.[1]
4-66-06-4
Dalla Valle E.
Planinsek F.
6-44-67-66
Rincon D.
Piros Z.[6]
6-23-66-3
Zakharov A.
Wassermann D.
4-66-06-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Vesely J.
6-36-4
Houkes M.
Moller E.
7-52-66-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Andreev A.
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.
Den Ouden G.
6-07-66
R32
Planinsek F.
Majchrzak K.[8]
6-40-2
Wassermann D.
Martineau M.[4]
6-46-3
Cerundolo J.[1]
Blockx A.
6-46-756-3
Guillen Meza A.
Agamenone F.
6-26-2
Rincon D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-36-3
Piros Z.[6]
Jasika O.
6-36-4
Zakharov A.
Sels J.
7-52-66-4
Dalla Valle E.
Travaglia S.
6-26-3
Vesely J.
Dellien H.[5]
6-46-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Deckers A.
4-67-666-4
Houkes M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Moller E.
Hassan B.[3]
6-06-766-3
Zapata Miralles B.
De Loore J.[7]
6-36-766-3
Andreev A.
Erhard M.
6-33-66-3
Den Ouden G.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-4
Barrios Vera T.
Rodionov J.[2]
7-616-1