Qinwen Zheng vs Sara Errani — Palermo Round of 32

Palermo · WTA · Round of 32
Qinwen Zheng
CHN1
Qinwen Zheng
#135WTA
1852ELO
1811Clay ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
ITA
Sara Errani
39 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLL
Zheng Q.
6-3 6-2
Errani S.
Zheng Q.
662
Errani S.
320

Qinwen Zheng defeated Sara Errani 6-3 6-2 in the Palermo round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Qinwen Zheng came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending the title. Qinwen Zheng extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-29Paris OlympicsR64clayQinwen Zheng6-0 6-0
2023-07-17PalermoR32clayQinwen Zheng6-0 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Errani S.

Errani S.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Zheng Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Errani S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
54%
76%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
56%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
54%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
46%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
0.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Errani S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
36
Break points saved·Dominant
96
8
Break points won·Even
100
98
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Errani S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
6.6
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Errani S.
Freshness·
99
—

Zheng Q.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 52%

Draw

Final
Zheng Q.[1]
Muchova K.[2]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Begu I.
6-16-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Parry D.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Sharma A.
7-657-66
Zheng Q.[1]
Cristian J.[7]
6-16-1
Begu I.
Li A.
6-36-4
Parry D.[4]
Paquet C.
7-51-66-4
R16
Muchova K.[2]
Noha Akugue N.
6-706-26-3
Paquet C.
Carle M.
6-36-1
Begu I.
Rus A.[5]
6-27-5
Cristian J.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-26-746-2
Sharma A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-43-66-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Martic P.
6-46-4
Li A.
Andreeva E.
6-34-66-4
R32
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-06-0
Carle M.
Maria T.[8]
5-76-16-1
Muchova K.[2]
Kawa K.
7-6145-1
Tomljanovic A.
Sherif M.
3-67-56-3
Sharma A.
Blinkova A.[6]
6-07-5
Martic P.
Arango E.
6-26-3
Cristian J.[7]
Riera J.
6-36-2
Rus A.[5]
Trevisan M.
6-756-46-2
Bronzetti L.
Jacquemot E.
7-53-66-3
Noha Akugue N.
Barthel M.
6-42-66-2
Zheng Q.[1]
Errani S.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Gadecki O.
4-66-46-4
Paquet C.
Zheng S.
6-36-3
Li A.
Stearns P.[3]
3-67-676-2
Teichmann J.
Ristic M.
6-16-1