Qinwen Zheng vs Jaqueline Cristian — Palermo Quarter-final

Palermo · WTA · Quarter-final
Qinwen Zheng
CHN1
Qinwen Zheng
#135WTA
1852ELO
1811Clay ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2024
clay
Jaqueline Cristian
ROU7
Jaqueline Cristian
#36WTA
1834ELO
1746Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Zheng Q.
6-1 6-1
Cristian J.
Zheng Q.
662
Cristian J.
110

Qinwen Zheng defeated Jaqueline Cristian 6-1 6-1 in the Palermo quarter-final on clay. Qinwen Zheng extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-07WuhanR32hardQinwen Zheng6-2 6-4
2021-07-19PalermoR16clayJaqueline Cristian6-1 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cristian J.

Cristian J.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Zheng Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Zheng Q.Cristian J.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
10

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Cristian J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Cristian J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
93
77
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
84
Break points won·Dominant
100
71
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
91
Tiebreaks·Even
89
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Cristian J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+65 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Clay Elo 1746
6.0Overall Elo 1852
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1834
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.1
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Cristian J.
Freshness·
99
—

Zheng Q.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
32°CClear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 52%

Draw

Final
Zheng Q.[1]
Muchova K.[2]
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Begu I.
6-16-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Parry D.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Muchova K.[2]
Sharma A.
7-657-66
Zheng Q.[1]
Cristian J.[7]
6-16-1
Begu I.
Li A.
6-36-4
Parry D.[4]
Paquet C.
7-51-66-4
R16
Muchova K.[2]
Noha Akugue N.
6-706-26-3
Paquet C.
Carle M.
6-36-1
Begu I.
Rus A.[5]
6-27-5
Cristian J.[7]
Bronzetti L.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Teichmann J.
6-26-746-2
Sharma A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-43-66-1
Zheng Q.[1]
Martic P.
6-46-4
Li A.
Andreeva E.
6-34-66-4
R32
Andreeva E.
Semenistaja D.
6-16-2
Begu I.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-06-0
Carle M.
Maria T.[8]
5-76-16-1
Muchova K.[2]
Kawa K.
7-6145-1
Tomljanovic A.
Sherif M.
3-67-56-3
Sharma A.
Blinkova A.[6]
6-07-5
Martic P.
Arango E.
6-26-3
Cristian J.[7]
Riera J.
6-36-2
Rus A.[5]
Trevisan M.
6-756-46-2
Bronzetti L.
Jacquemot E.
7-53-66-3
Noha Akugue N.
Barthel M.
6-42-66-2
Zheng Q.[1]
Errani S.
6-36-2
Parry D.[4]
Gadecki O.
4-66-46-4
Paquet C.
Zheng S.
6-36-3
Li A.
Stearns P.[3]
3-67-676-2
Teichmann J.
Ristic M.
6-16-1